Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01904799
NCT01904799CompletedNot Applicable

Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients: Reproductibility and Validity Study

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon1 site in 1 country263 target enrollmentStarted: January 2, 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
263
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
test of visual memory

Study Overview

Brief Summary

After a CVA, all of the cognitive functions can be affected and analysed, but the presence of a language disorder may considerably hamper the evaluation of other functions.

The battery of rapid tests to screen for and quantify cognitive disorders, including the MMSE, the MOCA, the R-CAMCOG or the RBANS, are not suitable for aphasic patients because they contain items with a strictly verbal response. Because of this, inexperienced doctors cannot evaluate higher functions (other than language) of aphasics in routine practice. For the same reason, aphasics are regularly excluded from post-cva therapeutic protocols, whether or not the trial bears on the evolution of cognitive functions.

Nonetheless, it is possible to evaluate, at least roughly, all of the cognitive functions without resorting to language.

The investigator have developed , from validated tests and classical clinical manoeuvers, the Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (CASP) :

  • for the rapid screening (less than 15 minutes) and quantification of post-cva cognitive disorders (6 functions: language, apraxia, short-term memory, temporal orientation, impaired spatial/visio-construction and executive functions);
  • the CASP can be used in most patients, including those with severe disorders of expression and moderate problems with comprehension, The format of these tests has been adapted so that severe disorders of expression (essentially left-hemisphere CVA), and left spatial impairment (right-hemisphere CVA) do not affect the ability to take the test. Its validity in terms of appearance and content were verified in 2011.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • For CVA patients
  • patients hospitalised in rehabilitation after a first recent hemispheric CVA (less than 6 weeks) ;
  • aged > 18;
  • absence of severe disorders of oral comprehension (BDAE aphasia severity score >2 for comprehension);
  • whatever the severity of oral expression disorders;
  • who have been given clear written and oral information, and after the doctor has verified their ability to understand the protocol.
  • For " Control " patients (to evaluate divergent validity)
  • patients hospitalised in rehabilitation units or geriatrics taking part in this study;
  • aged > 18.

Exclusion Criteria

  • For CVA patients
  • patients who do not speak French;
  • cognitive disorders known before the CVA;
  • psychotic disorders known before the CVA;
  • major visual disorders incompatible with reading, known before the CVA.
  • For " Control " patients (to evaluate divergent validity)
  • patients who do not speak French;
  • cognitive disorders known before the CVA;
  • psychotic disorders known before the CVA;
  • major visual disorders incompatible with reading, known before the CVA.

Arms & Interventions

Cognitive Assessment

Other

Intervention: Cognitive Assessment test (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

test of visual memory

Time Frame: Evaluation at 6 ± 2 weeks

comprehensive assessment battery of higher functions

Time Frame: Evaluation at 6 ± 2 weeks

comprehensive assessment battery of higher functions

Time Frame: baseline

comprehensive assessment battery of higher functions

Time Frame: Evaluation at 3 ±1 days

test of visual memory

Time Frame: baseline

test of visual memory

Time Frame: Evaluation at 3 ±1 days

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials