Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00740376
NCT00740376
Terminated
Not Applicable

A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized, Double Blind, Multi-center Study of the Uniglide™ Mobile Bearing Unicondylar Knee System vs. Uniglide™ Fixed Bearing Unicondylar Knee System

Corin6 sites in 1 country37 target enrollmentStarted: August 2008Last updated:
ConditionsOsteoarthritis

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Sponsor
Corin
Enrollment
37
Locations
6
Primary Endpoint
The Number of Implants Which Achieve Composite Clinical Success (CCS) at Month 24.

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the Uniglide™ Mobile Bearing Unicondylar Knee System (investigational device)is not inferior when compared to the Uniglide™ Fixed Bearing Unicondylar Knee System (control device currently cleared) as measured by the Composite Clinical Success (CCS) endpoint.

Detailed Description

Arthritic knees are the most common cause of long-term disability resulting in decreased mobility and increased pain. After other treatments for pain relief and return to activities of daily living fail, knee joint replacement is often the best option and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was introduced as an appropriate treatment for management of osteoarthritis when disease effects only a portion of the knee joint. This study is a prospective, comparative, randomized, double blind (patient and post-operative evaluator), multi-center clinical study under a common protocol to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Uniglide Unicondylar Mobile Bearing knee implant system.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
40 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • skeletally mature
  • need to obtain pain relief and improved function
  • moderate or severe pain with either walking or at rest on the Hospital for Special Surgery Score
  • preoperative medial tibiofemoral joint space narrowing on x-rays (Kellgren Lawrence grade 3 or 4)
  • preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Evaluation total score of \< 69
  • preoperative arc of motion of \> 90o in the affected knee
  • diagnosed with osteoarthritis in the medial compartment of the knee and non-surgical treatment options have failed to provide relief for symptoms
  • able to understand this clinical trial, co-operate with study procedures, and are willing to return to the clinic, and/or hospital for all the required post-operative follow-ups
  • able to give and have given voluntary, written informed patient consent to participate in this clinical investigation and have provided Authorization for Release of Personal Health Information (HIPAA) for the purpose of this clinical study
  • willing to be randomized with either of the devices used in the clinical trial as determined by the randomization schedule

Exclusion Criteria

  • neurological disorders which may interfere or adversely affect gait or weight bearing (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis)
  • a nutritional problem (protein, calorie, or vitamin/mineral deficiency) that may impair wound healing mechanisms
  • a diagnosed systemic disease that would affect their welfare or the overall outcome of study (i.e. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy)
  • immunologically suppressed
  • on chronic corticosteroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy
  • with Charcot's disease
  • with metabolic disorders (e.g. osteomalacia), which may impair bone formation
  • with distant foci of infections, which may spread to the implant site
  • have presence of vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy and neuromuscular disease
  • have diagnosed osteoporosis as evidenced on a DEXA scan (within the last 12 months)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Number of Implants Which Achieve Composite Clinical Success (CCS) at Month 24.

Time Frame: Month 24 postoperative

CCS success criteria includes the following: Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) success: ≥ 70 and; If preop HSS between 60-69, HSS ≥ 70 plus a min 10 point improvement; No radiographic failure: No radiolucent lines \>1mm in \>50% of zones around any component; No progressive radiolucencies; No radiographic evidence of implant subsidence (vertical displacement) \> 2mm of any component; No radiographic evidence of aseptic implant loosening, i.e. no changes in angular orientations \> 2 degrees; No removal, replacement, or revision (including planned removal, replacement, or revision) of any component (including the bearing) on or before day 730 following initial surgery.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Score (Total, Pain & Function Scores)(Month 24 postoperative)
  • Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sports/Rec & Quality of Life Scores)(Month 24 postoperative)
  • Number of Implants With Any Device-related Complications(Month 24 postoperative)
  • The Number of Implants With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post Operatively(Month 24 postoperative)
  • American Knee Society Score (AKSS) (Total, Pain & Function Scores)(Month 24 postoperative)
  • Survival Rate Using Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves(Month 24 postoperative)

Investigators

Sponsor
Corin
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (6)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials