跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02423317
NCT02423317已完成不适用

A Comparative Evaluation of Airtraq Optical LaryngoscopeTM and Miller Blade in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Requiring Tracheal Intubation.

Government Medical College, Haldwani0 个研究点目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2013年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
60
主要终点
Time to Intubation

研究概览

简要总结

The Airtraq optical laryngoscope has recently been available in pediatric sizes. The investigators compared the efficacy of Airtraq with the Miller laryngoscope as intubation devices in paediatric patients. This prospective, randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II paediatric patients of 2-10 years, posted for routine surgery requiring tracheal intubation were randomly allocated to undergo intubation using a Miller (n = 30) or Airtraq (n = 30) laryngoscope. The primary outcome measures were time of intubation, ease of intubation, number of attempts and POGO score. We also measured hemodynamic changes and airway trauma.

详细描述

After approval from the institutional Ethical Committee, 60 patients were studied. A randomised prospective study was planned to compare size 1 Airtraq (Prodol Meditec S.A., Vizcaya, Spain) with Miller blade of same size.

The children included in the study were 2-10 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II and posted for elective surgeries requiring tracheal intubation. The following were excluded from the study: (i) patients with upper respiratory tract symptoms, (ii) those at risk of gastroesophageal regurgitation and (iii) those with airway-related conditions such a trismus, limited mouth opening, trauma or mass. Sixty patients were equally randomized to one of the two groups (Airtraq and Miller) of 30 each for airway management using a computer-generated randomization program.

Written informed consent was taken from the parents prior to intervention and a standardized protocol for anesthesia was maintained for all cases. All the children were kept nil per mouth as per standard guidelines. Intubation attempts were taken using Airtraq or Miller on a random basis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
2 Years 至 10 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II,
  • elective surgeries requiring tracheal intubation

排除标准

  • patients with upper respiratory tract symptoms,
  • those at risk of gastroesophageal regurgitation and
  • those with airway-related conditions such a trismus, limited mouth opening, trauma or mass.

结局指标

主要结局

Time to Intubation

时间窗: 5 minutes

It is defined as the time from placement of Airtraq or Miller laryngoscope into the mouth till appearance of the capnograph waveform

次要结局

  • Overall Intubation Success Rate.(5 minutes)
  • Number of Intubation in First Attempts;(5 minutes)
  • Ease of Intubation.(5 minutes)
  • Number of Participants With Airway Trauma(5 minutes)
  • Percentage of Glottic Opening Scoring.(5 minutes)
  • Number of Esophageal Intubation.(5 minutes)

研究者

发起方
Government Medical College, Haldwani
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Bikramjit Das

Assistant Professor

Government Medical College, Haldwani

相似试验