The Cervical Trident Study
- Conditions
- Facet Joint Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT05353465
- Lead Sponsor
- Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
- Brief Summary
This observational retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of RF with the three-tined expandable electrode needle compared to before treatment in the treatment of chronic cervical facet joint pain.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- Age > 18 years old
- Patients with neck pain
- Patient who had two diagnostic medial branch blocks with significant (>50%) improvement on both injections.
- No patient related outcome measures available in hospital's patient charts
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain measurement by numeric rating score 2 months after injection in comparison to baseline The primary outcome of this study is pain measured with the numeric rating score (NRS): 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (the worst imaginable pain). A score of zero (0) will indicate that the patient is pain free, while a score of ten (10) will indicate that they are experiencing the worst pain imaginable.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Walking ability 2 months after injection Question: 'after the treatment, you can walk:
* More than before
* Same as before
* Less than before'Patient satisfaction 2 months after injection Question: are you satisfied with the result: YES/NO
Use of analgesics 2 months after injection The quantity of analgesics that the patient assumes for the pain:
* All stopped
* Decreased
* Equal
* IncreasedPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) 2 months after injection The PGIC rating is increasingly being used for determining clinically important change in measures such as ratings of pain. This scale is designed to quantify patient's improvement or deterioration over time, usually either to determine the effect of an intervention or to chart the clinical course of a condition. The scales ask that a person assess his or her current pain, recall that status at a previous time-point, and then calculate the difference between the two.
* very much improved
* much improved
* minimally improved
* no change
* minimally worse
* much worse
* very much worseSleep 2 months after injection Question: 'your sleep quality is:
* Improved
* Equal
* Worsened'
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland
🇨ðŸ‡Lugano, Switzerland