Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Diseases; Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
• Interventions: Procedure: Multiple arterial grafting; Procedure: Single arterial graft

• Registration Number: NCT04124120
• Lead Sponsor: Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Brief Summary

The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grfating (SAG).

The specific aims of ROMA:Women are:

Aim 1: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grfating (CABG). The investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,000 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (690 from the parent ROMA trial + 1,310 from ROMA:Women). Differences by important clinical and surgical subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated. The women enrolled in the ongoing ROMA trial (anticipated to be approximately 690) will be included in ROMA:Women, increasing efficiency and reducing enrollment time.

Hypothesis 1.0. MAG will reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Hypothesis 1.1. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.

Aim 2: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on generic and disease-specific QOL, physical and mental health symptoms in women undergoing CABG. The investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (including those enrolled in ROMA:QOL). Differences by important subgroups (as defined above) will also be evaluated.

Hypothesis 2.0. MAG will improve generic and disease-specific QOL compared to SAG.

Hypothesis 2.1. MAG will improve physical and mental health symptoms compared to SAG.

Hypothesis 2.2. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.

Detailed Description

ROMA:Women will leverage the infrastructure and the existing women population of the ROMA trial. ROMA:Women has two key Aims. In Aim 1, the investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,000 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (690 from the parent ROMA trial + 1,310 from ROMA:Women). In Aim 2, the investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated.

ROMA:Women is a two-arm, international, multi-center, randomized clinical trial nested in the ROMA trial. ROMA:Women will include all the women enrolled in the parent ROMA trial and will leverage the existing ROMA infrastructure including clinical trial unit, database, case report forms (CRF), randomization system, site training resources, informed consent forms (ICF), regulatory approvals, Central Events Review Committee (CEC) processes/personnel, network of participating sites, site PIs, and study coordinators. The planned randomization procedure, interventions and treatment arms, outcome assessments and follow-up protocol of ROMA:Women are identical to those of the currently ongoing parent ROMA trial. The sites participating in ROMA will continue enrollment of women after the completion of the ROMA trial and additional sites will also be opened to reach the target sample size of ROMA:Women.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-10-10
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-10-10
• Study First Posted: 2019-10-11
• Study Start: 2023-04-17
• Status Verified: 2025-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-04-04
• Last Update Posted: 2025-04-06
• Primary Completion: 2030-03
• Study Completion: 2030-03

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 2000

Inclusion Criteria

1. Women patients ≥18 years old.
2. Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
3. Primary (first time) cardiac surgery procedure.
4. Significant disease of the left main coronary artery or of the left anterior descending and the circumflex coronary system with or without disease of the right coronary artery.

Exclusion Criteria

• Male gender
• Single graft
• Emergency operation
• Myocardial infarction within 72 hours of surgery
• Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%
• Any concomitant cardiac or non-cardiac procedure
• Previous cardiac surgery
• Preoperative severe end-organ dysfunction (dialysis, liver failure, respiratory failure), cancer or any co-morbidity that reduces life expectancy to less than 5 years.
• Inability to use the saphenous vein or to use both radial and right internal thoracic arteries
• Anticipated need for coronary thrombo-endarterectomy
• Planned hybrid revascularization

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Multiple Arterial Graft (MAG) group	Multiple arterial grafting	Patients in the group will receive multiple arterial grafts. All patients will receive at least two arterial grafts, the left internal thoracic artery with the addition of either the right internal thoracic artery or the radial artery as the second conduit. Some patients may receive additional arterial grafts consisting of the radial artery, the right internal thoracic artery, or the right gastroepiploic artery.
Single Arterial Graft (SAG) group	Single arterial graft	Patients in this group will receive a single arterial graft which will be the left internal thoracic artery. Additional grafts used in this group will all be venous grafts.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Primary outcome for aim 2: Disease-specific quality of life	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a validated 19-item questionnaire that measures five domains related to coronary disease: angina frequency, physical limitations, quality of life, angina stability, and treatment satisfaction. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and better health status. The minimum clinically important difference on the SAQ is 5 points.; The primary endpoint for aim 2 is the absolute change in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at 12 months compared to baseline.
Primary outcome for aim 1: Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	The primary outcome for aim 1 will be a composite of the first occurrence of death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction (\>48 hours after surgery), repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Death from any cause	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Death will be considered to be cardiac unless a definite non-cardiac cause is identified.
Readmission for acute coronary syndrome	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Prolonged ischemic symptoms at rest (usually ≥10 minutes in duration), or accelerating pattern of chest pain that occurs with a lower activity threshold (CCS class III or IV) considered to be myocardial ischemia upon final diagnosis resulting in an unscheduled visit to a healthcare facility resulting in an overnight stay generally within 24 hours of the most recent symptoms, cardiac biomarkers not meeting MI criteria, and ECG or angiographic evidence of ischemia.
Readmission for heart failure	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Another secondary outcome for aim 1: While patients may have multiple simultaneous disease processes, for the outcome event of heart failure requiring hospitalization, the diagnosis of congestive heart failure would need to be the primary process. Heart failure (HF) requiring hospitalization is defined as an event that meets the following criteria: i. Requires hospitalization AND ii. Clinical symptoms of heart failure AND iii. Physical signs of heart failure AND iv. Need for additional/increased therapy AND v. No other non-cardiac etiology (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hepatic cirrhosis, acute renal failure, or venous insufficiency) and no other cardiac etiology (such as pulmonary embolus, cor pulmonale, primary pulmonary hypertension, or congenital heart disease) for signs or symptoms are identified.
Generic quality of life according to the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2)	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Secondary outcomes for aim 2: The SF-12v12 measures eight dimensions of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, vitality, general health perception, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health status.; The SF-12v2 has two summary measures: physical and mental self-perceived health with norm-based methods that standardize the score to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Stroke	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Based on the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Expert Consensus stroke definition, stroke will be identified in case of: 1. pathological, imaging, or other objective evidence of cerebral ischemic injury in a defined vascular distribution; OR; 2. clinical evidence of cerebral ischemic injury based on symptoms persisting ≥24 hours or until death, and other etiologies excluded.
Repeat revascularization	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Repeat revascularization will include any percutaneous or surgical revascularization on a grafted coronary artery after the initial operation.
Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	One of the secondary outcomes for aim 1: It will be a composite of the first occurrence of death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction (\>48 hours after surgery), and repeat revascularization.; This is the primary outcome of the parent ROMA trial.
Death from cardiac cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Another secondary outcome for aim 1: It will be a composite of the first occurrence of death from cardiac cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction (\>48 hours after surgery), repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
Mental and physical health symptoms according to PROMIS instruments	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Secondary outcomes for aim 2: Physical and mental health symptoms and physical functioning will be measured with standardized PROMIS instruments, including: Pain interference, Neuropathic Pain, Fatigue, Sleep disturbance, Depression, Anxiety, and Physical Function. A mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 represent the general population in the US.
Non-procedural myocardial infarction	> 48 hours postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Based on the 4th Universal Definition, non-periprocedural myocardial infarction will be identified in case of detection of rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers with at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit together with evidence of myocardial ischemia with at least one of the following: 1. symptoms of ischemia; 2. electrocardiogram changes indicative of new ischemia (new ST-T changes or new left bundle branch block); 3. development of pathological Q waves in the electrocardiogram; 4. imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality.
Generic quality of life according to EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D)	Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up	Secondary outcomes for aim 2: EQ-5D is a five-item instrument to assess health status in the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Individual domain scores will be converted to a summary index representing utility weights, which allow conduct of cost-effectiveness analyses.

Trial Locations

Locations (141)

London Health Sciences; 🇨🇦 London, Ontario, Canada

Acibadem-Sistina Hospital; 🇲🇰 Skopje, North Macedonia

Fraser Clinical Trials; 🇨🇦 New Westminster, Canada

Rigshospitalet; 🇩🇰 Copenhagen, Denmark

Jena University Hospital; 🇩🇪 Jena, Germany

University of Ottawa Heart Institute; 🇨🇦 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Heart Center Herzzentrum, Leipzig; 🇩🇪 Leipzig, Germany

Robert-Bosch-Hospital Stuttgart Germany; 🇩🇪 Stuttgart, Germany

Health Sciences North; 🇨🇦 Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier; 🇩🇪 Trier, Germany

Sunnybrook Health Sciences; 🇨🇦 Toronto, Ontario, Canada

G Kuppuswamy Naidu Memorial Hospital (GKNM); 🇮🇳 Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Star Hospitals - Hyderabad, India; 🇮🇳 Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Rambam Health Care Campus; 🇮🇱 Haifa, Israel

Anthea Hospital; 🇮🇹 Bari, Italy

Humanitas Gavazzeni of Bergamo; 🇮🇹 Bergamo, Italy

Fondazione Poliambulanza; 🇮🇹 Brescia, Italy

Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM; 🇮🇹 Cotignola, Italy

Toronto General Hospital; 🇨🇦 Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Montreal Heart Institute; 🇨🇦 Montréal, Quebec, Canada

Careggi University Hospital; 🇮🇹 Florence, Italy

European Hospital; 🇮🇹 Roma, Italy

Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; 🇮🇹 Roma, Italy

Ospedale Le Molinette, Torino; 🇮🇹 Torino, Italy

Tokyo Medical and Dental University; 🇯🇵 Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Saitama Medical University Japan; 🇯🇵 Saitama, Japan

Seoul National University Hospital; 🇰🇷 Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 🇰🇷 Seúl, Korea, Republic of

Maastricht University Medical Centre; 🇳🇱 Maastricht, Netherlands

Medical University of Silesia; 🇵🇱 Katowice, Poland

Zbigniew Religa Lower Silesian Heart Disease Centre; 🇵🇱 Zabrze, Poland

University Hospital Coimbra; 🇵🇹 Coimbra, Portugal

Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental; 🇵🇹 Lisboa, Portugal

Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Sao João; 🇵🇹 Porto, Portugal

National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences - Tomsk, Russia; 🇷🇺 Tomsk, Russian Federation

Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute; 🇷🇸 Belgrade, Serbia

National University of Singapore; 🇸🇬 Singapore, Singapore

University Hospital of Montreal; 🇨🇦 Montréal, Quebec, Canada

Royal Victoria Hospital; 🇨🇦 Montréal, Quebec, Canada

Hospital Universitario del Vinalopo; 🇪🇸 Elx, Alicante, Spain

Hospital Clinic de Barcelona; 🇪🇸 Barcelona, Spain

Hospital Clinico de San Carlos; 🇪🇸 Madrid, Spain

NavarraBiomed; 🇪🇸 Pamplona, Spain

Sahlgrenska University Hospital; 🇸🇪 Gothenburg, Sweden

National Taiwan University Hospital; 🇨🇳 Zhongzheng, Taipei, Taiwan

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec; 🇨🇦 Ste Foy, Quebec, Canada

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust; 🇬🇧 Multiple Locations, Oxford, United Kingdom

NHS Golden Jubilee; 🇬🇧 Clydebank, United Kingdom

The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh; 🇬🇧 Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Hull University Hospitals; 🇬🇧 Hull, United Kingdom

University Hospitals of Leicester; 🇬🇧 Leicester, United Kingdom

Hopital Sacre-Coeur; 🇨🇦 Montréal, Canada

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Foundation Trust; 🇬🇧 Liverpool, United Kingdom

Fuwai Hospital China; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China

Jilin Heart Hospital China; 🇨🇳 Changchun, Jilin, China

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; 🇬🇧 London, United Kingdom

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust; 🇬🇧 London, United Kingdom

St George's University Hospitals; 🇬🇧 London, United Kingdom

Manchester University NHS Trust; 🇬🇧 Manchester, United Kingdom

South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust; 🇬🇧 Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; 🇬🇧 Sheffield, United Kingdom

Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust; 🇬🇧 Wolverhampton, United Kingdom

Genesis Healthcare System; 🇺🇸 Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; 🇨🇳 Shanghai, Shanghai, China

Allegheny General Hospital; 🇺🇸 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Lankenau Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Rhode Island Hospital; 🇺🇸 Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Baylor Scott & White Research Institute; 🇺🇸 Dallas, Texas, United States

The University of Texas Medical Health Branch at Galveston; 🇺🇸 Galveston, Texas, United States

Victorian Heart Hospital; 🇦🇺 Clayton, Australia

Teda Hospital Tianjin China; 🇨🇳 Tianjin, Tianjin, China

Baylor College of Medicine; 🇺🇸 Houston, Texas, United States

UT Health San Antonio; 🇺🇸 San Antonio, Texas, United States

Hamilton General Hospital; 🇨🇦 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

The University of Melbourne; 🇦🇺 Melbourne, Australia

Kepler University Hospital; 🇦🇹 Linz, Austria

University of Utah; 🇺🇸 Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Krankenhaus Nord Vienna North Hospital; 🇦🇹 Vienna, Austria

Medical University of Graz; 🇦🇹 Graz, Austria

Innsbruck Medical University; 🇦🇹 Innsbruck, Austria

Medical University of Vienna; 🇦🇹 Vienna, Austria

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Los Angeles, California, United States

Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Pomona, California, United States

University of California, San Francisco; 🇺🇸 San Francisco, California, United States

University of Colorado; 🇺🇸 Aurora, Colorado, United States

Hartford Hospital; 🇺🇸 Hartford, Connecticut, United States

University Hospital Dubrava; 🇭🇷 Zagreb, Croatia

University Hradec Králové; 🇨🇿 Hradec Králové, Czechia

General University Hospital, Prague; 🇨🇿 Nové Město, Czechia

Institute of Cardiology Porto Alegre; 🇧🇷 Porto Alegre, Brazil

Heart Institute University of São Paulo; 🇧🇷 São Paulo, Brazil

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; 🇧🇷 Vila Mariana, Brazil

St. Boniface General Hospital; 🇨🇦 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Horizon Health Network - Saint John Regional Hospital; 🇨🇦 Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

NL Health Services; 🇨🇦 St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Aalborg University Hospital; 🇩🇰 Aalborg, Denmark

Universitäts-Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen Freiburg; 🇩🇪 Bad Krozingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany

HDZ NRW Bad Oeynhausen Germany; 🇩🇪 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charite; 🇩🇪 Berlin, Germany

Duisburg Heart Center; 🇩🇪 Duisburg, Germany

Dusseldorf University; 🇩🇪 Düsseldorf, Germany

Yale University Hospital; 🇺🇸 New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Emory University; 🇺🇸 Atlanta, Georgia, United States

University of Chicago; 🇺🇸 Chicago, Illinois, United States

University of Iowa; 🇺🇸 Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Johns Hopkins University; 🇺🇸 Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Baystate Health; 🇺🇸 Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School; 🇺🇸 Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

University of Michigan; 🇺🇸 Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital; 🇺🇸 Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Washington University in St. Louis; 🇺🇸 Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Nebraska Heart Hospital; 🇺🇸 Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

University Hospital Erlangen; 🇩🇪 Erlangen, Germany

Essen University; 🇩🇪 Essen, Germany

Frankfurt University; 🇩🇪 Frankfurt, Germany

University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg; 🇩🇪 Gießen, Germany

University Medical Center of Göttingen; 🇩🇪 Göttingen, Germany

Methodist Physicians Health; 🇺🇸 Omaha, Nebraska, United States

University of Nebraska Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Englewood Health; 🇺🇸 Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Newark Beth Israel Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Newark, New Jersey, United States

The Valley Hospital; 🇺🇸 Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States

NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital; 🇺🇸 Brooklyn, New York, United States

Weill Cornell Medicine; 🇺🇸 New York, New York, United States

Columbia University Medical Center; 🇺🇸 New York, New York, United States

Lenox Hill Hospital; 🇺🇸 New York, New York, United States

Ohio State University; 🇺🇸 Columbus, Ohio, United States

New York Presbyterian Queens; 🇺🇸 Queens, New York, United States

Duke University; 🇺🇸 Durham, North Carolina, United States

East Carolina University; 🇺🇸 Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Wake Forest University; 🇺🇸 Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Cleveland Clinic Foundation; 🇺🇸 Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; 🇬🇧 Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom

University of Pennsylvania; 🇺🇸 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Leiden University Medical Center; 🇳🇱 Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands

Erasmus Medical Center; 🇳🇱 Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Medical University Gdansk; 🇵🇱 Gdańsk, Poland

Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Sao Joao; 🇵🇹 Porto, Portugal

Karonlinska University Hospital; 🇸🇪 Stockholm, Sweden

University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust; 🇬🇧 Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Royal Papworth NHS Foundation Trust; 🇬🇧 Cambridge, United Kingdom