CTRI/2023/12/060916Not yet recruitingUnknown
A comparative study of efficacy of spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75% in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy undergoing emergency LSCS :A randomised controlled trail - Nil
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Unknown
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patient belonging to ASA 2-3
- •under going emergency LSCS with preeclampsia or chronic hypertension
- •Gestational age 37weeks to 42 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
- •Allergy to above drugs
- •Contraindications to spinal anaesthesia
- •Morbid obesity
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
Spinal anaesthesia for open hernia surgeryCTRI/2023/03/050366Government Stanley Medical College Hospital
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing effect of the spinal anesthesia induced hypotension treatments on neonatal factorsOther complications of spinal and epidural anaesthesia during labour and delivery.Other complications of spinal and epidural anaesthesia during labour and deliveryIRCT2016062028545N1Vice Chancellor for Research of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences120
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A study to compare spinal anaesthesia with general anaesthesia using drugs given intravenously for early discharge to home.CTRI/2020/11/029196SRM Institute of science and technology
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of ?Effectiveness of Spinal Anesthesia with General Anesthesia during Operative HysteroscopyIRCT201402187013N11Vice Chancellor for Research, Tabriz University of Medical? Sciences76
Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison between spinal anaesthesia and caudal anaesthesia in children undergoing surgeries below umbilicusCTRI/2023/07/054748Dr. Keerthana S