MedPath

Behavioural and Physiological Responses to Dog Visits in Nursing Homes

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Mood
Physiological Responses
Behavior
Interventions
Behavioral: Control visits/dog visits
Behavioral: Dog visits/control visits
Registration Number
NCT05516264
Lead Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Brief Summary

In brief the study aims to investigate how nursing home residents receiving dog visits respond to contact with the dog, by comparing visits with and without a dog present. The investigators will measure the response with non-invasive measures of the immediate physiological response, and objective behavioural measurements to quantity the activity and the actual amount and intensity of contact to the dog.

Detailed Description

The residents will receive six 10-minute visits, three visits with a dog and three without a dog, with a week-long break in between the two visit types. The participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the three dog visits or the three visits without a dog first. The visits will be from the same person, and the dog visits will be accompanied with the same dog each time. During dog visits, the dog will be available for touch, and the resident will be encouraged to interact with the dog.

Before each visit the resident is fitted with the equipment for measuring continuously recorded physiological measures and then relaxes for 30 minutes. Immediately before and five and 30 minutes after each visit, the investigators obtain a saliva sample to detect cortisol levels.

The behaviour of the participants will be video recorded during the visits to quantify the frequency and duration of predefined behavioural elements, using ethological methodology. The investigators will quantify the participants' activity during the visits as well as the frequency and duration of tactile contact with the dog, and verbal communication with the dog and the visitor.

In addition, the visitor and the observer present during the visit will subjectively assess the resident's perception of the visit.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age of 65 years or more
  • Able to sit during visits (either in a chair or in a bed)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known allergy to dogs
  • Known fear of dogs

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control visits firstControl visits/dog visitsParticipants receive the three control visits first and then, after a break, receive the three dog visits
Dog visits firstDog visits/control visitsParticipants receive the three dogs visits first and then, after a break, receive the three control visits
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Heart rate variabilityDuring visit no. 6, from 30 minutes before the visit to 30 minutes after

Heart rate variability is calculated from heart rate data

Salivary cortisolVisit 6, 30 minutes after visit

Saliva is obtained from the testperson with a swab which held his/her mouth for one minute

Heart rateDuring visit no. 6, from 30 minutes before the visit to 30 minutes after

The test person wears a device placed on the upper arm

Behaviour during visitsDuring visit no. 6, from 30 minutes before the visit to 30 minutes after

The test persons behaviour is observed

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual analoque scale of the testpersons' evaluation of the visit5 minutes after visit 6

Minimum value 0 (worst possible experience) to 100 (best possible experience)

The visitor's and observer's perception of how the visit was experienced by the test person.5 minutes after visit 6

Minimum value 0 (worst possible visit) to 100 (best possible visit)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Karen Thodberg

🇩🇰

Højslev, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath