COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL VISTA TECHNIQUE VERSUS VISTA TECHNIQUE WITH COLLAGEN MEMBRANE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE GINGIVAL RECESSION DEFECT A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 24
- Locations
- 1
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness of the conventional VISTA (Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access) technique with VISTA technique using a collagen membrane for treating multiple gingival recession defects.A total of 24 patients will be selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria from outpatient sections of Department of Periodontics,Tamilnadu Government Dental College and Hospital.The patients will be assigned to one of the following groups with 12 patients in each GROUP A-Conventional VISTA technique,GROUP B-VISTA with collagen membrane.The study evaluates clinical outcomes such as root coverage, gain in clinical attachment level, reduction in recession depth, and overall esthetic improvement. Participants with multiple gingival recessions were randomly assigned to either the conventional VISTA group or the VISTA plus collagen membrane group.The objective was to determine whether adding a collagen membrane enhances the regenerative potential and improves treatment outcomes compared to the conventional technique alone. The results help clarify whether the adjunctive use of a collagen membrane provides significant additional clinical benefits in managing multiple gingival recession defects.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Masking
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 45.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients within the age group of 18 to 45 of either gender Patient with good general health without any history of systemic disease or under medication.
- •Patient having Class I and Class II recession defects Millers classification system Cairos RT1 in Maxilla Patients who are non smokers Patient having adequate zone of attached gingiva with minimal probing depth in the treatment zone Periodontally healthy patients Patient willing to undergo minor surgical procedure Patients willing to follow recommended plaque control and follow up regimen Patients who are willing for voluntary participation and have signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients showing poor oral hygiene maintenance after Phase-I therapy.
- •Patients with known acute and chronic local and systemic disease.
- •Root caries and cervical abrasion.
- •Previous surgical attempt to correct the gingival recession.
- •Aberrant frenal attachment.
- •Molar and premolar teeth with furcation involvement.
- •Patients using any form of tobacco.
- •Patients who are alcoholics.
- •Pregnant / Lactating women Patients with any known allergies.
Investigators
VINU PRIYA P
Tamilnadu government dental college and hospital