Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02219464
NCT02219464CompletedNot Applicable

Nasopharyngeal Versus Nasal Cannula Oxygen Supplementation in Surgery Patients

Vanderbilt University2 sites in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: August 2014Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
60
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Number of Participants With Oxygen Saturations Below 92%

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled trial comparing nasopharyngeal oxygen supplementation to traditional nasal cannula in patients undergoing oral surgery under moderate sedation.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
16 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients greater than 16 years of age
  • Patients who present for oral surgery or esophagoduodenography and colonoscopy
  • Patients who undergo intravenous sedation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who require endotracheal intubation
  • ASA class 4 or higher
  • Existing esophageal disease such as a perforation or varices

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of Participants With Oxygen Saturations Below 92%

Time Frame: During surgical procedure

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of Participants Who Needed Airway Assistance Interventions(During surgical procedure)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Bret Alvis

Assistant Professor

Vanderbilt University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials