Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07184372
NCT07184372CompletedNot Applicable

Radiofrequency 448khz in Patients Post Covid 19 With Respiratory Sequelae.

Clinica Gema Leon1 site in 1 country96 target enrollmentStarted: June 16, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
96
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Spirometry

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The sequelae that occur in post-COVID-19 patients are multiple and, at a therapeutic level, these represent a new challenge within the general context of the pandemic that the world is suffering.

The virus has managed to end thousands of lives today and many other cases are being charged as directly responsible for a multiplicity of multisystem damages that need to be diagnosed and treated. Among the most relevant, are those that can affect to respiratory levels in patients without previous pahologies, and in patients at risk who already had a pathology prior to infection.

On the other hand, signs and symptoms have been observed characteristic in the organ systems described above in post-contagion patients, directly associated with sequelae SARV-CoV2. The radiofrequency (RF) of electromagnetic waves represents a technology of proven efficacy and safety in multiple fields of both human and veterinary medicine.

These include neurological pathologies, respiratory disease and very especially those that affect the locomotor system. In therapeutics there are different RF modalities depending on the modality, polarity, type of signal and frequency, which in turn translate into different therapeutic profiles, clinical indications, efficacy and safety.

Among the RF technologies most used today and that have a greater scientific background, is the one known as Resistive Capacitive Monopolar RadioFrequency at 448 kHz (INDIBA®) (RFMCR). This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of RFMCR in the treatment of respiratory sequelae in patients presenting this type of pathologies that appear after contagion by COVID-19. Through this non-invasive technique, the investigators want to show that RF can help the physical rehabilitation of these patients through metabolic stimulation, increased vascularization and oxygenation of directly affected tissues, effects of deep hyperthermia generated by the interaction of the current with the treated biological substrate, as well as the activationof tissue regeneration, the result of subthermal action. It is thus intended to improve signs such as lung capacity, dyspnea, neuropathies and global muscle capacity, which are essential for the recovery of the post-COVID-19 patients.

The hypothesis of this study is that current post-COVID-19 treatments can be significantly improved in order to prevent complications and ensure the patients' well-being.

Detailed Description

The new post-pandemic era has left sequelae in patients who presented the signs and symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 and subsequently faced a positive for COVID-19. Such sequelae will be evident at various systemic levels of the affected patienta in the short, medium and long term future. One of these levels is respiratory complications and injuries that have been documented throughout all scientific research since the beginning of passive infections worldwide.

SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted by penetrating the respiratory route (mostly), by fluid contact, and to a lesser extent, through the ocular pathway. In the field of neurology system, different forms of RF, nerve infiltrations, lymph node injuries, plantar fasciitis, spinal (peripheral) nerve disorders, etc. have been documented.

If the investigators focus on one of the most prevalent symptoms (those that affect the respiratory system), the bibliography that endorses that the RFMCR could improve has been referenced.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combined manual therapy and 448 kHz radiofrequency treatment in the recovery of lung capacity in patients with post-COVID-19 sequelae. The work proposed here aims to demonstrate the advantages of establishing RF as an excellent treatment for post-COVID-19 sequelae, due to its ability to reinforce immune action, modulate the inflammatory response and activate cellular and tissue regeneration.

The specific objectives of this research work are:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •have passed covid 19
  • •have respiratory sequelae after covid 19 during more than a month
  • •have dyspnea, cough or fatigue

Exclusion Criteria

  • •be pregnant
  • •have pacemaker
  • •have or had passes thrombosis
  • •have a respiratory disease before covid

Arms & Interventions

Placebo group

Placebo Comparator

The radiofrequency is turn off during the treatment

Intervention: Placebo (Other)

Conventional Group

Active Comparator

Manual tecniques are applied to improve lung capacity

Intervention: Manual tecniques (Other)

Experimental Group

Experimental

Manual tecniques and radiofrequency are applied to improve lung capacity

Intervention: Radiofrequency and manual tecniques (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Spirometry

Time Frame: 3 months

spirometry tests were performed in the same manner: the patient was seated with their feet flat on the floor and a nose clip was placed on the patient and they were asked to take two normal breaths, and on the third, to take a maximum inhalation and a maximum exhalation. We obteined the following parameters: FVC (Forced Vital Capacity), FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second), FVC/FEV1 (Ratio of FVC to volume expired in 1 second), PEF (Peak Expiratory Flow), PEFT (Peak Expiratory Flow Time), FEF50% (Forced expiratory flow at 50% of expiration), FEF25% - FEF75% (Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of expiration), FEF50%/FIF50 (Ratio of forced expiratory flow at 50% of expiration to forced inspiratory flow at 50% of inspiration) and FEV1/FEV0.5 (Ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced expiratory volume in the first 0.5 s

Secondary Outcomes

  • Sadoul Dyspnea Scale(3 months)
  • Leiscester Test(3 months)
  • Chest measurements(3 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Clinica Gema Leon
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

GEMA LEÓN BRAVO

Gema León Bravo

Clinica Gema Leon

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials