The Preformed Metal Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique Versus the Conventional Restoration

Completed

• Conditions: Caries; Dentin; Dental Caries
• Interventions: Other: Assessment of the stainless steel crown using the Hall Technique and Compomer Restoration on primary molars

• Registration Number: NCT04818658
• Lead Sponsor: Bahçeşehir University

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.

Detailed Description

comparing the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2021-03-08
• Study First Submitted: 2021-03-24
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-03-24
• Study First Posted: 2021-03-26
• Primary Completion: 2021-10-03
• Study Completion: 2021-12-10
• Status Verified: 2022-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2022-07-19
• Last Update Posted: 2022-07-21

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 26

Inclusion Criteria

• patients aged five to eight years at the time of dental treatment,
• patients attending follow-up appointments
• patients with compomer restoration and Hall restoration in their teeth
• patients with matching the extent of caries in the two groups

Exclusion Criteria

• patients not attending follow-up appointments
• patients without both treatment

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Preformed Metal Crowns using Hall Technique	Assessment of the stainless steel crown using the Hall Technique and Compomer Restoration on primary molars	-
Compomer Restoration	Assessment of the stainless steel crown using the Hall Technique and Compomer Restoration on primary molars	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The survival rate of Hall Technique and Compomer Restorations	5 year	1. Successful: restoration satisfactory, no additional treatment required, no clinical sign and symptoms of pulpal pathology or tooth exfoliated,; 2. Minor failure: restoration wear/fracture/loss (restorable) or crown perforation, secondary caries or new caries, reversible pulpitis treated without requiring extraction or pulpotomy,; 3. Major failure: the tooth is broken down (unrestorable), inter-radicular radiolucency or internal root resorption, signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis requiring extraction or pulpotomy.; 4. The survival analysis: the restorations are assessed as successful or failure.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bahcesehir University; 🇹🇷 Istanbul, Turkey