Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05810987
NCT05810987CompletedNot Applicable

Remote Education Strategies Training Oncology Residents for End-of-Life Discussions (The RESTORED Study)

McMaster University1 site in 1 country23 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
23
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
COM-ON (Communication in Oncology) Checklist

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Difficult conversations are common in oncology practice and patient-centered communication is essential to care for individuals with cancer. Within oncology training programs, communication training is mostly unstructured observation and feedback in the clinic and many learners receive inadequate training. Currently, educational resources are limited, and residents have indicated a desire for more education on end-of-life communication skills. A formal communication curriculum could fill a gap and help to standardize teaching and evaluation.

The overall goal of this study is to establish an effective communication skills curriculum for oncology residents that can be delivered remotely and that addresses difficult conversations with cancer patients. Through this preliminary study, we will explore the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing different training experiences to understand how best to help oncology residents develop strong end-of-life communication skills.

Detailed Description

Background:

Patient-centered communication is essential to care for individuals with cancer. High quality communication benefits patients, families, and clinicians. Proficiency in a variety of communication tasks is now a requirement within competency-based medical education (CBME) in Canada. Within oncology training programs, communication training is mostly unstructured observation and feedback in the clinic and many learners receive inadequate training. A formal communication curriculum could fill a gap and help to standardize teaching and evaluation, but current resources are limited.

Virtual care has been quickly adopted within oncology practice in the context of the COVID19 pandemic. This limits opportunities for direct observation of learners making assessment of communication skills more difficult. How best to teach communication skills in the context of virtual care is unclear. To mitigate current challenges, we will adapt two recognized educational tools, electronic learning modules (ELMs) and standardized patients (SPs), to create a novel virtual training strategy. Typically, SP skills sessions occur in person and effectiveness of SP encounters in a virtual care context has not been evaluated. Moreover, it is uncertain whether SPs are necessary for creation of psychological fidelity or improvement of transfer of communication skills. Thus, we aim to explore the relative impact of each component of a virtual communication curriculum. In this study, we will explore the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing different training experiences.

Methods:

ELMs will be developed to teach communication skills for difficult conversations in oncology care. A framework for patient-centered communication and specific communication strategies will be introduced. Scenarios will be developed for virtual SP encounters related to each ELM. Virtual SP encounters will occur through the Zoom platform and include feedback from a remote faculty observer.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Medical and radiation oncology residents and fellows at McMaster University, and medical oncology residents at the Universities of Ottawa and Toronto.
  • •Enrollment in a participating training program, ability to participate in study-related activities in English, access to internet and a video-enabled computer (either personal or institutional) to support study-related activities

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Not enrolled in a participating training program

Arms & Interventions

ELMs and virtual SP encounters

Experimental

A virtual communication curriculum featuring electronic learning modules (ELMs) and skills sessions with standardized patients (SPs) along with coaching feedback.

Intervention: Medical Interaction and Coaching (Behavioral)

ELMs and virtual SP encounters

Experimental

A virtual communication curriculum featuring electronic learning modules (ELMs) and skills sessions with standardized patients (SPs) along with coaching feedback.

Intervention: RESTORE (Other)

ELMs alone

Active Comparator

A virtual communication curriculum featuring electronic learning modules (ELMs) only.

Intervention: RESTORE (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

COM-ON (Communication in Oncology) Checklist

Time Frame: 3 months

Validated rating scale assessing general and specific communication skills in oncology. Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = ''Skill not demonstrated at all'' to 5 = ''Skill fully demonstrated'', with higher scores denoting higher quality communication.

QQPPI (Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction)

Time Frame: 3 months

Validated patient-facing rating scale of for quality of physician communication. Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = ''I do not agree'' to 5 = ''I fully agree'', with higher scores denoting higher quality communication.

Assessment rubric for 'entrustable professional activities' (EPAs)

Time Frame: 3 months

Medical interaction analysis rating scale as defined by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = ''I do not agree'' to 5 = ''I fully agree'', with higher scores denoting higher quality communication.

Global rating scale

Time Frame: 3 months

Overall rating scale of quality of physician communication. Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = ''I do not agree'' to 5 = ''I fully agree'', with higher scores denoting higher quality communication.

Secondary Outcomes

  • RESTORED Questionnaire(Immediately after the intervention)
  • End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey (EPCS)(3 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials