跳至主要内容
临床试验/jRCTs032200430
jRCTs032200430
招募中
不适用

Cochlear implantation for unilateral severe to profound hearing loss

未提供0 个研究点目标入组 38 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

概览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
38
主要终点
speech perception test by using 67S Japanese monosyllable word table under the SoNnh, SN+0dB noise condition

概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Single Arm Study
干预模型
Single Assignment
主要目的
Treatment Purpose
盲法
Open(masking Not Used)

入排标准

年龄范围
6age old over 至 No limit(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • General criteria
  • (1) Patient agreed to participate in the study and signed to the informed consent document.
  • (if patient is a monor, patiens or legal guardians sign to the informed consent document.)
  • (2) Age of 6 years or older when agreed.
  • Audiological criteria
  • (1) The patient withbpost-lingual onset unilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
  • (2) The pure tone average (500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz, and 4000Hz) of affected side was 70dBHL or more, or 30% or less speech perception score in affected ear with hearing aid.
  • (3) The onset of hearing loss was 6 months or more and expect the insufficient improvement of hearing ability by conventional treatment.
  • (4) The pure tone average (500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz, and 4000Hz) of contralateral side was 40dBHL oe less.

排除标准

  • The patients with below situations were exclude from this study.
  • (1) Hearing recovery was observed in past 6 month greater than 15dB.
  • (2) Cochear ossification in patients with hearing loss (meningitis, otosclerosis).
  • (3) Severe malformation and cochlear obstraction.
  • (4) Severe outer ear malformation and does not wear audioprosessor.
  • (5) High risk for general anesthesia.
  • (6) Active middle eat infection.
  • (7) Clearly evidenced retro-labryinthine hearing loss adult.
  • (8) Severe mental retardation adult.

结局指标

主要结局

speech perception test by using 67S Japanese monosyllable word table under the SoNnh, SN+0dB noise condition

时间窗: before operation and 12 months after CI fitting

Marked recovery is defined as the average improvement of CI intervention group is significantly better than that of non-treated historical control group (N=17, average improvement: 10.9%, standard deviation: 24.4) by t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

次要结局

  • Marked recovery

研究者

发起方
未提供

相似试验