跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03520556
NCT03520556已完成不适用

Do Docosahexaenoic and Eicosapentaenoic Acids Have Similar Effects on Inflammation Markers? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Laval University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1 人开始时间: 2018年4月16日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in plasma concentration of CRP

研究概览

简要总结

According to the World Health Organization, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the number 1 cause of death globally. Systemic and local tissue inflammation is now recognized as a key etiological process leading to CVD. Hence, elevated blood levels of inflammation markers are classified among the well-established risk factors for the development of CVD. Among nutritional strategies to prevent and/or reduce chronic inflammation, long-chain omega 3 PUFA (LCn-3PUFA), notably eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have raised tremendous interest for their purported anti-inflammatory effects. Previous meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) substantiated the anti-inflammatory effect of LCn-3PUFA supplementation as evidenced by significant reductions in plasma concentrations of specific inflammation markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). However, it is stressed that almost all of the reported RCTs have used a mix of EPA and DHA in various ratios, as EPA and DHA occur concomitantly and naturally in food (fish oils) and in most dietary supplements. Yet, several recent RCTs have recently been undertaken to test the hypothesis that not all LCn-3PUFAs are equal, at least when it comes to their anti-inflammatory effects. Accordingly, there is increasing interest and evidence for potential distinctive effects of DHA compared to EPA on systemic inflammation, raising the question: Is DHA a more potent anti-inflammatory nutrient than EPA? To formally answer this question, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to assess and compare the individual anti-inflammatory effects of DHA and of EPA. The present work will be a pairwise and network meta-analysis focusing on RCTs comparing the effects of EPA and DHA on surrogate markers of systemic inflammation. The findings generated by these analyses will provide invaluable and timely comparative information on the specific efficacy of DHA and EPA as one of the key nutritional modalities for the treatment of chronic inflammation in high-risk men and women. This is important considering that LCn-3PUFA supplements are increasingly being used by the population and an ever growing market in the dietary supplements' industry.

详细描述

Background: Increased systemic inflammation is positively correlated with the risk for CVD. Among nutritional strategies to prevent and/or reduce chronic inflammation, long-chain omega 3 PUFA (LCn-3PUFA), notably eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have raised tremendous interest for their purported anti-inflammatory effects.

Need for the proposed research: New emerging data from RCTs suggesting distinct effects of DHA and EPA on systemic inflammation calls for a formal analysis of existing data through a systematic review and meta-analysis, which are considered the gold standard of evidence to inform dietary guidelines.

Objective: To conduct a pairwise and network meta-analysis of RCTs in humans to compare the effects of DHA and EPA on surrogate markers of inflammation.

Design: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and The PRISMA Extension Statement for conducting Network Meta-analyses.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library will be searched using appropriate search terms.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Randomized controlled trials of ≥7 days duration in humans
  • Suitable control (i.e. fatty acids other than EPA and DHA as control)
  • Adults (18 years old and older)
  • Viable outcome data

排除标准

  • Non-human studies
  • Non-randomized treatment allocation
  • Randomized controlled trials of <7 days duration
  • Lack of a suitable control
  • No viable outcome data

结局指标

主要结局

Change in plasma concentration of CRP

时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years

Change in fasting plasma concentration of CRP with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control

Change in plasma concentration of TNF-alpha

时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years

Change in fasting plasma concentration of TNF-alpha with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control

Change in plasma concentration of IL-6

时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years

Change in fasting plasma concentration of IL-6 with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control

Change in plasma concentration of adiponectin

时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years

Change in fasting plasma concentration of adiponectin with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Benoit Lamarche

Principal Investigator

Laval University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验