Do Docosahexaenoic and Eicosapentaenoic Acids Have Similar Effects on Inflammation Markers? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 1
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in plasma concentration of CRP
研究概览
简要总结
According to the World Health Organization, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the number 1 cause of death globally. Systemic and local tissue inflammation is now recognized as a key etiological process leading to CVD. Hence, elevated blood levels of inflammation markers are classified among the well-established risk factors for the development of CVD. Among nutritional strategies to prevent and/or reduce chronic inflammation, long-chain omega 3 PUFA (LCn-3PUFA), notably eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have raised tremendous interest for their purported anti-inflammatory effects. Previous meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) substantiated the anti-inflammatory effect of LCn-3PUFA supplementation as evidenced by significant reductions in plasma concentrations of specific inflammation markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). However, it is stressed that almost all of the reported RCTs have used a mix of EPA and DHA in various ratios, as EPA and DHA occur concomitantly and naturally in food (fish oils) and in most dietary supplements. Yet, several recent RCTs have recently been undertaken to test the hypothesis that not all LCn-3PUFAs are equal, at least when it comes to their anti-inflammatory effects. Accordingly, there is increasing interest and evidence for potential distinctive effects of DHA compared to EPA on systemic inflammation, raising the question: Is DHA a more potent anti-inflammatory nutrient than EPA? To formally answer this question, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to assess and compare the individual anti-inflammatory effects of DHA and of EPA. The present work will be a pairwise and network meta-analysis focusing on RCTs comparing the effects of EPA and DHA on surrogate markers of systemic inflammation. The findings generated by these analyses will provide invaluable and timely comparative information on the specific efficacy of DHA and EPA as one of the key nutritional modalities for the treatment of chronic inflammation in high-risk men and women. This is important considering that LCn-3PUFA supplements are increasingly being used by the population and an ever growing market in the dietary supplements' industry.
详细描述
Background: Increased systemic inflammation is positively correlated with the risk for CVD. Among nutritional strategies to prevent and/or reduce chronic inflammation, long-chain omega 3 PUFA (LCn-3PUFA), notably eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have raised tremendous interest for their purported anti-inflammatory effects.
Need for the proposed research: New emerging data from RCTs suggesting distinct effects of DHA and EPA on systemic inflammation calls for a formal analysis of existing data through a systematic review and meta-analysis, which are considered the gold standard of evidence to inform dietary guidelines.
Objective: To conduct a pairwise and network meta-analysis of RCTs in humans to compare the effects of DHA and EPA on surrogate markers of inflammation.
Design: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and The PRISMA Extension Statement for conducting Network Meta-analyses.
Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library will be searched using appropriate search terms.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Randomized controlled trials of ≥7 days duration in humans
- •Suitable control (i.e. fatty acids other than EPA and DHA as control)
- •Adults (18 years old and older)
- •Viable outcome data
排除标准
- •Non-human studies
- •Non-randomized treatment allocation
- •Randomized controlled trials of <7 days duration
- •Lack of a suitable control
- •No viable outcome data
结局指标
主要结局
Change in plasma concentration of CRP
时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years
Change in fasting plasma concentration of CRP with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control
Change in plasma concentration of TNF-alpha
时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years
Change in fasting plasma concentration of TNF-alpha with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control
Change in plasma concentration of IL-6
时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years
Change in fasting plasma concentration of IL-6 with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control
Change in plasma concentration of adiponectin
时间窗: Baseline and up to 5 years
Change in fasting plasma concentration of adiponectin with DHA vs. EPA or DHA vs. control or EPA vs. control
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Benoit Lamarche
Principal Investigator
Laval University
