Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Overlays on Endodontically Treated Molars Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: Two-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 50
- Primary Endpoint
- Modified USPHS Criteria
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Cementation of indirect restoration is a determinant of the success or failure of the fabricated restoration and consequentially the entire tooth. While there are numerous commercially available resin cements in the dental market, not all have been sufficiently assessed with significant follow up periods to clinically determine their success or failure. As such, this research will be conducted to elucidate if there is a viability to the cementation of indirect hybrid ceramic blocks over endodontically treated teeth using bioactive self-adhesive resin cement and determining whether it provides a clinical advantage and improved restoration serviceability in the oral cavity.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 21 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patient Related Criteria:
- •Adult patients (age: 21-50 years) of both genders.
- •Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
- •Willing to sign the informed consent.
- •Accepts the follow-up period.
- •Tooth Related Criteria:
- •Endodontically treated first and second permanent molars.
- •Access cavities with one missing proximal wall i.e. Occluso-mesial/distal cavities
- •Patients with proper oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
- •Endodontically treated anterior, premolar and third molar teeth
- •Badly broken-down teeth
- •Hopelessly carious/destructed teeth necessitating extraction
- •Mobile teeth, indicating periodontal disease or trauma.
- •External or internal resorption.
- •Cervical carious lesions
- •Medically compromised patients
- •Patients with known allergies to Latex and/or resinous material
Arms & Interventions
Indirect Restorations cemented using SHOFU BeautiLink Resin Cement
Intervention: Resin Cement (Other)
Indirect Restorations cemented using Coltene Solocem Resin Cement
Intervention: Resin Cement (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Modified USPHS Criteria
Time Frame: 2 years
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Ahmed Nabil Hassan Shalaby
Assistant Lecturer - Conservative Dentistry Department - MIU
Cairo University