Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Endodontically Treated Molar

• Registration Number: NCT06787469
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

Cementation of indirect restoration is a determinant of the success or failure of the fabricated restoration and consequentially the entire tooth. While there are numerous commercially available resin cements in the dental market, not all have been sufficiently assessed with significant follow up periods to clinically determine their success or failure. As such, this research will be conducted to elucidate if there is a viability to the cementation of indirect hybrid ceramic blocks over endodontically treated teeth using bioactive self-adhesive resin cement and determining whether it provides a clinical advantage and improved restoration serviceability in the oral cavity.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2025-01-16
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-01-16
• Study First Posted: 2025-01-22
• Status Verified: 2025-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-06-08
• Last Update Posted: 2025-06-10
• Study Start: 2025-06-23
• Primary Completion: 2026-06-01
• Study Completion: 2027-01-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 50

Inclusion Criteria

• Patient Related Criteria:
• Adult patients (age: 21-50 years) of both genders.
• Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
• Willing to sign the informed consent.
• Accepts the follow-up period.

Tooth Related Criteria:

• Endodontically treated first and second permanent molars.
• Access cavities with one missing proximal wall i.e. Occluso-mesial/distal cavities
• Patients with proper oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

• Endodontically treated anterior, premolar and third molar teeth
• Badly broken-down teeth
• Hopelessly carious/destructed teeth necessitating extraction
• Mobile teeth, indicating periodontal disease or trauma.
• External or internal resorption.
• Cervical carious lesions
• Medically compromised patients
• Patients with known allergies to Latex and/or resinous material

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Modified USPHS Criteria	2 years