跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06060002
NCT06060002尚未招募不适用

Role of Prophylactic Biliary Stent in Reducing the Recurrence of Choledocholithiasis and Biliary Complications After Stone Clearance in Patients Awaiting Cholecystectomy-A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial (STONE Trial)

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India0 个研究点目标入组 480 人开始时间: 2023年9月30日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
480
主要终点
To compare the CDL recurrence rate between the 2 groups

研究概览

简要总结

We planned this multicenter randomized controlled trial to study the role of a prophylactic biliary stent in recurrence of stones and biliary complications in patients awaiting cholecystectomy after biliary stone clearance

详细描述

Patients with cholelithiasis can have presence of concomitant choledocholithiasis (CDL) in upto 30%. These stones may remain asymptomatic or cause obstructive jaundice and complications like cholangitis and pancreatitis. In situations where there is a failure of CDL clearance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), biliary stenting is recommended to prevent complications. However, the role of prophylactic biliary stenting in situations where CDL clearance has been achieved, and the patient is awaiting cholecystectomy is debatable. One retrospective study showed benefit while a small prospective study and a retrospective study did not show benefit of prophylactic biliary stenting. Moreover, a randomized controlled trial addressing this question is lacking. Hence, we planned this multicenter randomized controlled trial to study the role of a prophylactic biliary stent in recurrence of stones and biliary complications in patients awaiting cholecystectomy after biliary stone clearance.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age between 18-80 years
  • Cases of cholelithiasis with concomitant CDL in whom CBD clearance is achieved will be included.

排除标准

  • Informed consent not available
  • Patients opting for single stage surgery
  • Previous hepatobiliary surgery
  • Failure to completely clear CDL on ERC
  • Concomitant benign biliary strictures (like chronic pancreatitis, portal cavernoma cholangiopathy, post cholecystectomy, primary biliary cholangitis related)
  • Previous cholecystectomy patients
  • Associated malignancy
  • Coagulopathy(INR>1.5, platlets<1lac)
  • Severe cholangitis

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the CDL recurrence rate between the 2 groups

时间窗: 3 Months

次要结局

  • To compare the biliary complications between the 2 groups(3 Months)
  • To compare the pancreatic complications between the 2 groups -To compare the need for repeat ERC between the 2 groups The outcomes will be compared during the time period of 3 months irrespective of the timing of cholecystectomy.(3 Months)

研究者

发起方
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验