Role of Prophylactic Biliary Stent in Reducing the Recurrence of Choledocholithiasis

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Choledocholithiasis

• Registration Number: NCT06060002
• Lead Sponsor: Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Brief Summary

We planned this multicenter randomized controlled trial to study the role of a prophylactic biliary stent in recurrence of stones and biliary complications in patients awaiting cholecystectomy after biliary stone clearance

Detailed Description

Patients with cholelithiasis can have presence of concomitant choledocholithiasis (CDL) in upto 30%. These stones may remain asymptomatic or cause obstructive jaundice and complications like cholangitis and pancreatitis. In situations where there is a failure of CDL clearance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), biliary stenting is recommended to prevent complications. However, the role of prophylactic biliary stenting in situations where CDL clearance has been achieved, and the patient is awaiting cholecystectomy is debatable. One retrospective study showed benefit while a small prospective study and a retrospective study did not show benefit of prophylactic biliary stenting. Moreover, a randomized controlled trial addressing this question is lacking. Hence, we planned this multicenter randomized controlled trial to study the role of a prophylactic biliary stent in recurrence of stones and biliary complications in patients awaiting cholecystectomy after biliary stone clearance.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2023-09
• Study First Submitted: 2023-09-13
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-09-27
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-09-27
• Study First Posted: 2023-09-29
• Last Update Posted: 2023-09-29
• Study Start: 2023-09-30
• Primary Completion: 2025-12-30
• Study Completion: 2025-12-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 480

Inclusion Criteria

• Age between 18-80 years
• Cases of cholelithiasis with concomitant CDL in whom CBD clearance is achieved will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

• Informed consent not available
• Patients opting for single stage surgery
• Previous hepatobiliary surgery
• Failure to completely clear CDL on ERC
• Concomitant benign biliary strictures (like chronic pancreatitis, portal cavernoma cholangiopathy, post cholecystectomy, primary biliary cholangitis related)
• Previous cholecystectomy patients
• Associated malignancy
• Coagulopathy(INR>1.5, platlets<1lac)
• Severe cholangitis

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To compare the CDL recurrence rate between the 2 groups	3 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To compare the biliary complications between the 2 groups	3 Months
To compare the pancreatic complications between the 2 groups -To compare the need for repeat ERC between the 2 groups The outcomes will be compared during the time period of 3 months irrespective of the timing of cholecystectomy.	3 Months