跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06306365
NCT06306365
已完成
不适用

Intervention Program on Executive Functions, Participation and Well-being in Older Adults Using Modern Board Games.

European University Miguel de Cervantes1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 35 人2024年2月7日

概览

阶段
不适用
干预措施
未指定
疾病 / 适应症
Executive Functions
发起方
European University Miguel de Cervantes
入组人数
35
试验地点
1
主要终点
Assessment of quality of life in older adults and people with disabilities
状态
已完成
最后更新
去年

概览

简要总结

The aim of the study is to assess the effects of an intervention using modern board game-based learning in a sample of older individuals. The evaluation will focus on determining if there is a change in executive functions, social participation, and participants' perception of well-being.

详细描述

The aim of the study is to assess the effects of an intervention using modern board game-based learning in a sample of older individuals. The intervention will last for 12 weeks, incorporating the use of the 16 board games identified in the previous study, which also established the most suitable adaptations and methodologies for this age group. The study will take place in a senior living facility. A quasi-experimental methodology will be employed, involving both a control group and an experimental group. The evaluation will focus on determining if there is a change in executive functions, social participation, and participants' perception of well-being.

注册库
clinicaltrials.gov
开始日期
2024年2月7日
结束日期
2024年6月28日
最后更新
去年
研究类型
Interventional
研究设计
Parallel
性别
All

研究者

发起方
European University Miguel de Cervantes
责任方
Sponsor

入排标准

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Assessment of quality of life in older adults and people with disabilities

时间窗: 0 weeks,12 weeks

The FUMAT scale (Gómez, Verdugo, Arias, and Navas, 2008) is an assessment instrument composed of 8 subscales that make up Quality of Life. In this study, the dimensions corresponding to will be used: emotional well-being (8 items, minimun score 8, maximum score 32); interpersonal relationships (6 items, minimun score 6, maximum score 24); personal development (8 items, minimum score 8, maximum score 32); social inclusión (9 items, minimun score 9, maximum score 36).

Trail Making Test to evaluate Executive Functions

时间窗: 0 weeks,12 weeks

As a complement to assess executive functions, the TESEN (Trail Making Test to evaluate Executive Functions) is used, by Portellano Pérez and Martínez Arias (2014). It consists of four subtests (trails) where the evaluated person initiates increasingly complex cognitive processes and demands that measure functions such as working memory, prospective memory, motor processing speed, perceptual speed, inhibition, sustained attention, and alternating attention. The TESEN provides three different scores for each trail, which are: execution score (E=hits-errors/time), speed score (V=time in seconds), and accuracy score (P=hits-errors/hits). In the quick correction mode, these values can be converted into decatips, a scale from 1 to 10, where the highest level indicates better development of executive functions.

Psychometric development and practical use

时间窗: 0 weeks,12 weeks

The Volitional Questionnaire (VQ) by De las Heras, Geist, and Kielhofner (1998) consists of 14 items with a four-level scale, covering the continuum from spontaneous (highest level) to passive (lowest level). The total score of the questionnaire is 56 points and is divided into three scales (exploration, competence, and achievement). A higher score indicates higher levels of volition. Below is indicated the subscale, the number of ítems, the mínimum score and the máximum sore: exploration (5 items, mínimum score 5, maximum score 20), competence (5 items, mínimum score 5, maximum score 20), achievement (4 items, mínimum score 4, maximum score 15).

Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly

时间窗: 0 weeks,12 weeks

The cognitive subscale "CAMCONG" is used, Section B of the CAMDEX-R (Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly, adapted to Spanish by López-Pousa (2015)). It consists of 60 items (neuropsychological areas). The maximum score is 105 points in this revised option. In the scale validated by López-Pousa and others (1990), the cutoff point that best discriminated between a subject with dementia and one without dementia was 69/70. The scores for the different cognitive functions: orientation (minimun score 0, máximum score 10), language (minimun score 0, maximum score 30), memory (minimum score 0, maximum score 27), attention/calculation (minimum score 0, maximum score 9), praxis (minimun score 0, máximum score 12), abstract thinking (minimum score 0, maximum score 8), perception (mínimum score 0, máximum score 9). Minimum score: 0, total maximum score: 105. Executive function (maximum score is 28). A higher score indicates a better state of executive functions.

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验