MedPath

Effect of Stuttering Remediation Exercises on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Developmental Stuttering
Evoked Potentials Auditory
Interventions
Behavioral: Fluency shaping exercises
Registration Number
NCT05473572
Lead Sponsor
Alaa Mamdouh
Brief Summary

studying how the cortical auditory evoked potentials differ in children who stutter from who do not stutter and how these potentials change with therapy

Detailed Description

Measuring amplitude and latency of P1, N1, P2 N2 between a group with developmental stuttering and a control group with no stuttering at baseline. Recording the potentials through passive listening to a 60dB stimulus and active speaking, describing pictures and rapid naming.

Assigning the group with stuttering to remediation exercises using fluency shaping program for 2 to 4 months then remeasuring amplitude and latency of the previously mentioned potentials.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
34
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Children who stutterFluency shaping exercisesMeasuring stuttering severity and cortical auditory evoked potentials in a group of children who stutter then they will receive fluency shaping exercises for a period range from 2-4 months. Reassessment of cortical auditory evoked potentials and stuttering severity after the specified period
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in latency of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering due to stuttering intervention programimmediately after intervention

Measuring latency in millisecond of P1, N1 in the group who stutter after intervention using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM) device during passive listening to a 60dB auditory stimulus and active speaking conditions

Change in amplitude of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering due to stuttering intervention programimmediately after intervention

Measuring amplitude in microvolt of P1, N1 in the group who stutter after intervention using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM) device during passive listening to a 60dB auditory stimulus and active speaking conditions

Difference in amplitude of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering compared to children who do do not stutterbaseline: before intervention

Measuring amplitude in microvolt of P1, N1 using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM)

Difference in latency of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering compared to children who do do not stutterbaseline: before intervention

Measuring latency in millisecond of P1, N1 using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM) device during passive listening to a 60dB auditory stimulus and active speaking conditions

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria universtiy

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath