Effect of Stuttering Remediation Exercises on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
- Conditions
- Developmental StutteringEvoked Potentials Auditory
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Fluency shaping exercises
- Registration Number
- NCT05473572
- Lead Sponsor
- Alaa Mamdouh
- Brief Summary
studying how the cortical auditory evoked potentials differ in children who stutter from who do not stutter and how these potentials change with therapy
- Detailed Description
Measuring amplitude and latency of P1, N1, P2 N2 between a group with developmental stuttering and a control group with no stuttering at baseline. Recording the potentials through passive listening to a 60dB stimulus and active speaking, describing pictures and rapid naming.
Assigning the group with stuttering to remediation exercises using fluency shaping program for 2 to 4 months then remeasuring amplitude and latency of the previously mentioned potentials.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 34
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Children who stutter Fluency shaping exercises Measuring stuttering severity and cortical auditory evoked potentials in a group of children who stutter then they will receive fluency shaping exercises for a period range from 2-4 months. Reassessment of cortical auditory evoked potentials and stuttering severity after the specified period
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in latency of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering due to stuttering intervention program immediately after intervention Measuring latency in millisecond of P1, N1 in the group who stutter after intervention using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM) device during passive listening to a 60dB auditory stimulus and active speaking conditions
Change in amplitude of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering due to stuttering intervention program immediately after intervention Measuring amplitude in microvolt of P1, N1 in the group who stutter after intervention using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM) device during passive listening to a 60dB auditory stimulus and active speaking conditions
Difference in amplitude of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering compared to children who do do not stutter baseline: before intervention Measuring amplitude in microvolt of P1, N1 using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM)
Difference in latency of cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with stuttering compared to children who do do not stutter baseline: before intervention Measuring latency in millisecond of P1, N1 using the commercial system (Interacoustic Eclipse TM) device during passive listening to a 60dB auditory stimulus and active speaking conditions
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria universtiy
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt