Comparison of Outcomes Between Biceps Tenotomy and Tenodesis in the Treatment of the Long Head of the Biceps Pathology
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Chronic Refractive Bicipital Pain
- Interventions
- Procedure: Biceps tenotomyProcedure: Biceps tenodesis
- Registration Number
- NCT02107586
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine what the different outcomes are for biceps tenodesis and tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of the biceps pathology.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 6
Inclusion Criteria
- patient with chronic refractive bicipital pain
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Biceps tenotomy Biceps tenotomy 32 subjects in the study will receive biceps tenotomy as a surgical intervention Biceps tenodesis Biceps tenodesis 32 subjects in the study will receive biceps tenodesis as a surgical intervention
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score one year The scale measures pain from 0 to 10 and also includes a questionnaire for assessing the activity of daily living.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method EuroQol EQ-5D one year The questionnaire measures mobility, ability to care for self, ability to perform usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Chicago Medical Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States