Crossover Study of the LMA SupremeTM vs Ambu-Aura GainTM
- Conditions
- Airway Morbidity
- Interventions
- Procedure: function testsDevice: LMA SupremeTMDevice: Ambu-Aura GainTM
- Registration Number
- NCT02458794
- Lead Sponsor
- Schulthess Klinik
- Brief Summary
The Ambu-Aura GainTM is a new extraglottic airway device which brings together features of both the LMA ProSealTM (high seal cuff, gastric access and bite block - to facilitate ventilation, airway protection and airway obstruction, respectively) and the LMA UniqueTM (single use - prevention of disease transmission). In the following randomized, crossover study, the investigators test the hypothesis that ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fiberoptic position and ease of gastric tube placement differ between the Ambu-Aura GainTM and the LMA SupremeTM in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- ASA 1 or 2
- Age 19-65 yr
- Written informed consent
- Difficult airway
- Non fasted
- BMI > 35
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ambu-Aura GainTM function tests function tests: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure, fiberoptic position, ease of ventilation, occult blood, gastric tube insertion LMA SupremeTM function tests function tests: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure, fiberoptic position, ease of ventilation, occult blood, gastric tube insertion LMA SupremeTM LMA SupremeTM function tests: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure, fiberoptic position, ease of ventilation, occult blood, gastric tube insertion Ambu-Aura GainTM Ambu-Aura GainTM function tests: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure, fiberoptic position, ease of ventilation, occult blood, gastric tube insertion
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method oropharyngeal seal pressure 5 minutes Oropharyngeal leak pressure was determined by closing the expiratory valve of the anesthesia breathing system and a fixed gas flow of 3 l minute-1. The airway pressure at which an equilibrium was reached was noted (maximum allowed 40 cm H2O).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method anatomic position 5 minutes The anatomic position was assessed by passing a fiberoptic scope through the airway tube stopping 0,5 cm prior to the end of the tube. The airway tube view was scored using an established scoring system.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Schulthess Klinik
šØšZürich, Switzerland
Zentralkrankenhaus Bozen
š®š¹Bozen, Italy