Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01341418
NCT01341418CompletedNot Applicable

Randomized Clinical Trial of Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Tibial Nailing: A Pilot Study

Florida Orthopaedic Institute4 sites in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: April 2011Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
40
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
residual postoperative knee pain

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study compares two techniques for the fixation of tibial fractures. The techniques are the suprapatellar (above knee)or infrapatellar (below knee) approach to tibial intramedullary nailing. Null hypothesis: There is no difference in 1) residual post-operative pain levels, 2)knee function, 3) healing and alignment of the tibia, or 4) trochlear changes in the patello-femoral cartilage between patients who are randomized to receive tibial nail insertion through either a suprapatellar nail entry portal or a standard patellar tendon approach.

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing tibial fracture repair will be consented and randomized into one of the two techniques, with arthroscopic photos taken before and after nail insertion to study the condition of the patello-femoral cartilage. Enrolled patients will be followed for one year in clinic.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Tibial shaft fractures amenable and indicated for repair with intramedullary nails, with or without the use of reaming
  • Acute tibial fractures within 4 weeks of injury
  • Closed or open tibial fractures after appropriate irrigation and debridement
  • Fractures must be within metaphyseal/diaphyseal junctures defined as middle 3/5 of tibia
  • Skeletally mature patient
  • Age 18 and above.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Tibial shaft fractures that require articular reconstruction with plates
  • Any tibial fracture extending > 1 cm into the proximal or distal 1/5 of tibia
  • Tibial plateau fractures
  • Pilon fractures
  • Periprosthetic fractures
  • Non-unions
  • Prior knee surgery
  • History of gout or rheumatoid or osteoarthritis
  • Concomitant injury to same limb (including any traumatic injury to ipsilateral knee, femur or foot, and knee dislocation)
  • Spinal injury
  • Prisoner or high likelihood of incarceration
  • Not likely to follow-up in the estimation of surgeon
  • Pregnant females

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

residual postoperative knee pain

Time Frame: 1 year

A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be used for knee pain, as well as a pain location diagram and a Lysholm knee score.

Secondary Outcomes

  • union/alignment of tibia(3 months postoperatively)
  • knee function(6 months postoperatively)
  • trochlear changes in the patello-femoral cartilage(1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Network
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials