跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04907695
NCT04907695已完成不适用

A Prospective Comparison of the Disposable I-view Versus the Durable Video Laryngoscopes in the Emergency Department

Brooke Army Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 168 人开始时间: 2021年6月23日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
168
试验地点
2
主要终点
Intubation first-pass success rate

研究概览

简要总结

The US Military is rapidly transitioning into preparing for multi-domain operations. Previous data demonstrates that the most common airway replaced in the prehospital combat setting is endotracheal intubation. Previous studies have suggested that video laryngoscopy (VL) is superior to direct laryngoscopy (DL), which is most prominently noted in the office users . However, the current durable equipment video laryngoscopes are very expensive and cost prohibitive for dispersion around the battlefield. The i-view is a novel video laryngoscope that is marketed for VL and is inexpensive and disposable. Both the durable VL and the i-view are already in use in our emergency department (ED). The investigators are also already collecting data using these devices as part of an approved protocol for an airway registry. The investigators are seeking to utilizing a clinical rotating protocol to compare these two devices in the emergency department.

详细描述

OBJECTIVE:

The investigators are seeking to implement a clinical rotating protocol in which the investigators will use alternating months for which VL device is to be used comparing the i-view to the reusable devices within our department.

The investigators are seeking to answer the following questions:

  1. Does the i-view have similar first pass success rates compared to the reusable VL devices (e.g. GlideScope, C-Mac)?
  2. Does the i-view have similar attempts required for placement compared to the reusable VL devices?

SUBJECT POPULATION:

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • We are seeking any encounter for which the patient undergoes VL intubation as part of routine clinical care.

排除标准

  • No intubation will be excluded so long as VL is used.

结局指标

主要结局

Intubation first-pass success rate

时间窗: Peri-procedural

First-pass success between the i-view and the durable VL devices.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Steven Schauer

Physician Scientist

Brooke Army Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验