The use of a patellar strap in athletes with a jumper’s knee: A pilot study on the effect on symptoms, proprioception and tendon structure
- Conditions
- Jumper's kneepatellar tendinopathy
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON28088
- Lead Sponsor
- niversity Medical Center Groningen
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 25
Inclusion Criteria
Age 18-50 years
- Current symptoms of knee pain in the patellar tendon or its patellar or tibial insertion in connection with training and competition in one or both knees
Exclusion Criteria
- Signs or symptoms of other (co-)existing knee pathologies
- Use of drugs with a putative effect on patellar tendinopathy in the last year on daily basis or painkillers
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain after ten single leg decline squats between the patellar strap and control condition will be used as the main study outcome in this study. <br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference in VAS pain score between both conditions (control and strap) during the jump test and the triple hop test are secondary outcomes, as well as the height (m) and distance (m) measured during these tests. In addition, the difference in proprioception (Joint Position Sense expressed by the deviation in millimeters from a marker) between both conditions is also a secondary outcome measure. <br><br>The difference in percentage of echotypes 1,2,3 and 4 between the follow up UTC measurement (effect of a patellar strap) compared to the baseline UTC measurement (no patellar strap) are also secondary outcomes. Finally, the comfort grade (0-10) of wearing the Genupoint patellar strap is a secondary outcome parameter.