跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/10/075747
CTRI/2024/10/075747尚未招募2 期

Comparitive study between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to continuous ropivacaine epidural infusion for post-operative analgesia in abdominal cancer surgeries

Indira Gandhi Medical college, shimla1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年11月2日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
1. To compare the efficacy and duration of post operative epidural analgesia

研究概览

简要总结

Although the limited data available suggests that dexmedetomedine as an adjuvant to continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine has superior results in post-operative analgesia and less side-effects as compared to fentanyl. To establish this efficacy further validation and research is required. Therefore, we planned a study to determine the efficacy of both the adjuvants and compare post-operative analgesia and rescue requirement and also, dose reduction in requirement of local anaesthetic after the addition of adjuvant.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patient scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgeries
  • ASA grade I-III women
  • Age group 18 -70 years 4.

排除标准

  • Infection at epidural site
  • History of coagulopathy
  • Severely hypovolemic patients
  • Raised ICP
  • Refusal for epidural analgesia
  • Pre-existing neurological deficit or demyelinating disorders
  • Severe spinal deformity
  • Known allergy to local anaesthetics or fentanyl or dexmedetomedine
  • Chronic pain or long term opiods or NSAIDS usage
  • Those who have coexisting cardio-respiratory disease e.g. ventricular dysfunction or history of AV Block /bradyarrythmias
  • Catheter removal unintentionally
  • Asymmetric or unilateral block requiring catheter manipulation
  • Patient not extubated and transferred to ICU
  • Surgery with blood loss more than 30%.

结局指标

主要结局

1. To compare the efficacy and duration of post operative epidural analgesia

时间窗: 48 hours

between the two groups using VAS score at rest and movement

时间窗: 48 hours

2. To compare cumulative consumption of rescue analgesia between the two groups

时间窗: 48 hours

次要结局

  • To compare time to first rescue analgesia requirement between the two groups(48 hours)
  • To compare incidence of such as bradycardia, hypotension and sedation,(post-operative ileus and nausea & vomiting between two groups)

研究者

发起方
Indira Gandhi Medical college, shimla
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Aparna Sharma

Indira Gandhi Medical college, shimla

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验