Comparision laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000007934
- Lead Sponsor
- Emergency and Critical Care Center, Hokkaido University Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Patients used other air way devices except laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method condition of ventilation on arrival to hospital
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms of laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask in airway management during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
How does the laryngeal tube compare to laryngeal mask in terms of efficacy and safety for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in OHCA patients?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict successful airway management with laryngeal tube or laryngeal mask in OHCA scenarios?
What are the potential adverse events associated with laryngeal tube versus laryngeal mask use during emergency airway interventions in OHCA?
What are the current standard-of-care airway management strategies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to the approaches in JPRN-UMIN000007934?