MedPath

High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia in Cardiac Surgery

Not Applicable
Conditions
Cardiac Surgery Patients
Interventions
Other: opioid-sparing protocol
Registration Number
NCT06437886
Lead Sponsor
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Brief Summary

BACKGROUND In cardiac surgery, high-dose opioid contributes to adverse events associated with poor postoperative outcomes. There is growing evidence that nerve block-based multi-modal anesthesia protocols may reduce intraoperative opioid consumption without compromising analgesia management and consequently improve patient's early postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block could improve early postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged 45 to 70 years undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Key exclusion criteria included contraindication to interventions or drugs and a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use.

INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block (intervention group) or opioid-based anaesthesia (control group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72h after surgery, postoperative pain score, the incidence of postoperative adverse events and chronic pain. Other outcomes included endotracheal intubation duration, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria

Male or female adult patients aged 45 to 70 years, awaiting elective cardiac surgery, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classes II or III were eligible.

Exclusion Criteria

contraindications to punctual or local anesthetic drugs, a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use, and an inability to communicate or refuse to enroll.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
pecto-intercostal fascial block and rectus sheath block-based opioid-sparing anesthesiaopioid-sparing protocol-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
QoR-15 at 24hat 24 hours after surgery

the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number rating score (NRS)NRS at 24 hours and 72 hours after surgery

Postoperatvie pain was evaluated using a number rating score (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain possible).

postoperative adverse eventsduring hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 days

postoperative adverse events included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCEs), moderate to severe acute kidney injury (AKI), moderate to severe acute liver injury, reintubation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

chronic painat 3 months after surgery

persistent postoperative pain lasting beyond 3 months

QoR-15 at 72hQoR-15 at 72 hours after surgery

the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 72h after surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fuwai hospital

🇨🇳

Beijing, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath