Facts-Up-Front Versus Traffic-Light Food Labels: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Yale University
- Enrollment
- 703
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Nutrient Comparison and Nutrient Level Estimation Accuracy
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The U.S. food and beverage industry recently released a new front-of-package nutrition labeling system called Facts Up Front that will be used on thousands of food products. The purpose of this study was to test consumer understanding of the Facts Up Front nutrition labeling system compared to the Multiple Traffic Light system (Traffic Light). Facts Up Front displays grams/milligrams and % daily value information for various nutrients; Traffic Light uses an interpretive color-coded scheme to alert consumers to low, medium or high levels of certain nutrients. Participants in an Internet-based study were randomized to one of five front-of-package label conditions: 1) No Label; 2) Traffic Light; 3) Traffic Light plus information about protein and fiber (Traffic Light+); 4) Facts Up Front; or 5) Facts Up Front plus information about "nutrients to encourage" (Facts Up Front+). Total percentage correct quiz scores were generated reflecting participants' ability to compare two foods on nutrient levels, based on their labels, and to estimate amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber and protein in foods. 703 adult participants recruited through an online database in May 2011 participated in this Internet-based study and data were analyzed in June 2011. The investigators hypothesized that the Traffic Light label groups would perform better than the Facts Up Front groups on all outcomes.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Participants in Survey Sampling International Panels
Exclusion Criteria
- •Younger than 18 years old
Arms & Interventions
Facts Up Front
Intervention: Facts Up Front (Behavioral)
Facts Up Front+
Intervention: Facts Up Front+ (Behavioral)
No front of package label
Intervention: No label control group (Behavioral)
Traffic Light+
Intervention: Traffic Light+ (Behavioral)
Traffic Light
Intervention: Traffic Light (Behavioral)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Nutrient Comparison and Nutrient Level Estimation Accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants took a nutrient level comparison quiz asking them to identify which of two products presented side-by-side in the same food category were higher or lower in different nutrients. Participants also viewed 8 individual products and estimated whether the product had low, medium or high amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber, and protein. The primary outcomes were total percentage correct on these quizzes.
Perceptions of Health, Taste and Purchase Intent
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants rated how healthy they thought each individual product was, how good it would taste and their likelihood to buy the product for themselves and their children (answered only by those who reported having children) using a 9-point Likert scale. Each set of ratings was averaged across eight products.
Secondary Outcomes
- Consumer Label Preferences(Baseline)
Investigators
Christina Roberto
Principal Investigator
Yale University
