MedPath

An Efficacy Study of Teriflunomide in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Multiple Sclerosis
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT00751881
Lead Sponsor
Sanofi
Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study was to assess the effect of two doses of teriflunomide, in comparison to placebo, on the frequency of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses in participants with relapsing MS.

Key secondary objective was to assess the effect of the two doses of teriflunomide, in comparison to placebo, on disability progression.

Other secondary objectives were:

* To assess the effect of the two doses of teriflunomide in comparison to placebo on:

* Fatigue;

* Health-related quality of life, a measure of the impact of the participant's health on his or her overall well being.

* To evaluate the safety and tolerability of teriflunomide.

Detailed Description

The study consists of:

* A core treatment period: Teriflunomide 7 mg or Teriflunomide 14 mg or placebo was administered in double-blind fashion until a fixed common end date which was approximately 48 weeks after randomization of the last participant.

* An extension treatment period: the highest dose of teriflunomide was administered in open-label fashion to participants who successfully complete the core treatment period and wish to continue.

The overall treatment period was followed by a 4-week elimination follow-up period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1169
Inclusion Criteria
  • Relapsing multiple sclerosis,
  • Two relapses in prior 2 years or one relapse in prior year.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Clinically relevant cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine or other major systemic disease,
  • Significantly impaired bone marrow function or, significant anemia, leukopenia or thrombocytopenia,
  • Pregnant or nursing woman,
  • Alcohol or drug abuse,
  • Prior or concomitant use of cladribine, mitoxantrone, or other immunosuppressant agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, methotrexate or mycophenolate,
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive,
  • Any known condition or circumstance that would prevent, in the investigator's opinion, compliance or completion of the study.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Placebo / Teriflunomide 14 mgPlaceboCore treatment period: Placebo (for teriflunomide) once daily. Extension treatment period: Teriflunomide 14 mg once daily.
Teriflunomide 7 mg / 14 mgTeriflunomideCore treatment period: Teriflunomide 7 mg once daily. Extension treatment period: Teriflunomide 14 mg once daily.
Teriflunomide 14 mg / 14 mgTeriflunomideCore treatment period: Teriflunomide 14 mg once daily. Extension treatment period: Teriflunomide 14 mg once daily.
Placebo / Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomideCore treatment period: Placebo (for teriflunomide) once daily. Extension treatment period: Teriflunomide 14 mg once daily.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression EstimateCore treatment period between 48 - 152 weeks depending on time of enrollment

ARR is obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the sum of treatment durations.

Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever - was to be confirmed by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score or Functional System scores.

To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as "offset" variable; treatment group, region of enrollment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Short Form Generic Health Survey - 36 Items (SF-36) Summary ScoresBaseline (before randomization), Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

SF-36 scale is a generic, self-administered, health-related quality-of-life (QOL) instrument. It is constructed such that the 36 questions represent 8 of the most important health concepts: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.

Two summary scores are obtained:

* the physical health component summary score,

* the mental health component summary score.

Both scores range from 0 to 100 and a high score indicates a more favorable health state.

Baseline adjusted least-squares means at week 48 were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures \[MMRM\] on each summary score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors). All the timepoints from randomization up to Week 48 were included in the model.

Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline to Last Visit in Short Form Generic Health Survey - 36 Items (SF-36) Summary ScoresBaseline (before randomization) and up to Week 152

Baseline adjusted least-squares means at last visit were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on collected data for each summary score (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit number for the last visit and baseline value as factors).

Extension Treatment Period: Overview of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)From first intake of study drug in extension treatment period up to 28 days after the last intake in the extension treatment period

AEs were any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.

Core Treatment Period: Time to Disability ProgressionCore treatment period between 48 - 152 weeks depending on time of enrollment

Probability of disability progression at 24, 48, 108 and 132 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to disability progression defined as the time from randomization to first 12-week sustained disability progression \[i.e. increase from baseline of at least 1 point in EDSS score (at least 0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS score \>5.5) that persisted for at least 12 weeks\].

Participants free of disability progression (no disability progression observed on treatment) were censored at the date of the last on-treatment EDSS evaluation.

Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t. Probability of event at time t is 1 minus the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.

Core Treatment Period: Time Without RelapseCore treatment period between 48 - 152 weeks depending on time of enrollment

Probability of no relapse at 24, 48, 108 and 132 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to relapse defined as the time from randomization to first EDSS confirmed relapse.

Participants free of confirmed relapse (no EDSS confirmed relapse observed on treatment) were censored at the date of the last study drug intake.

Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in EDSS Total ScoreBaseline (before randomization), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation.

EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS).

Baseline adjusted least-squares means at Week 48 were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on EDSS score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors). All the timepoints from randomization up to Week 48 were included in the model.

Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total ScoreBaseline (before randomization), Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

FIS is a participants-reported scale that qualifies the impact of fatigue on daily life in participants with MS. It consists of 40 statements that measure fatigue in 3 areas; physical, cognitive, and social.

FIS total score ranges from 0 (no problem) to 160 (extreme problem).

Baseline adjusted least-squares means at week 48 were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on FIS total score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors). All the timepoints from randomization up to Week 48 were included in the model.

Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline to Last Visit in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total ScoreBaseline (before randomization) and up to Week 152

Baseline adjusted least-squares means at last visit were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on collected data for FIS total score (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit number for the last visit and baseline value as factors).

Core Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse EventsFrom first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the core treatment period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first

Adverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.

Extension Treatment Period: Time to Disability ProgressionCore treatment period (maximum: 173 weeks) and Extension treatment period (maximum: 174 weeks)

Probability of disability progression since the randomization of the core period was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to disability progression defined as the time from randomization to first 12 week sustained disability progression \[i.e. increase from baseline of at least 1 point in EDSS score (at least 0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS score \>5.5) that persisted for at least 12 weeks\].

Participants free of disability progression (no disability progression observed on treatment) were censored at the date of the last on-treatment EDSS evaluation.

Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event free for the amount of time t. Probability of event at time t was 1 minus the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.

Extension Treatment Period: ARR: Poisson Regression EstimateExtension treatment period (Maximum: 174 weeks)

ARR was obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the sum of treatment durations. A relapse is defined as the appearance of a new clinical sign/symptom or clinical worsening of a previous sign/symptom (one that had been stable for at least 30 days) that persists for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever. Relapse was confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System scores. To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as "offset" variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).

Trial Locations

Locations (193)

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840041

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840084

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840008

🇺🇸

Loma Linda, California, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840034

🇺🇸

Modesto, California, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840090

🇺🇸

Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840011

🇺🇸

Fairfield, Connecticut, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840013

🇺🇸

Maitland, Florida, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840083

🇺🇸

Ocala, Florida, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840086

🇺🇸

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840025

🇺🇸

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Scroll for more (183 remaining)
Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840041
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath