跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00855231
NCT00855231已完成不适用

Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice CT Angiography for Acute Chest Pain - Assessment of Chest Pain Utilizing a Triple Rule Out Evaluation With Computed Tomography (ACUTE CT) Trial

University of Washington1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 102 人开始时间: 2006年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
102
试验地点
1
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy of CT compared to standard of care evaluation

研究概览

简要总结

The ACUTE CT trial is designed to test whether the assessment of chest structures by high-resolution multislice computed tomography (CT) provides equivalent diagnostic accuracy for patient with acute chest pain or other potential cardiac symptoms as compared to a standard of care evaluation.

详细描述

Adults at low to intermediate risk of acute coronary syndrome who present to the Emergency Department with symptoms suggestive of cardiac ischemia will undergo a blinded cardiac CT followed by a standard of care (SOC) strategy. Significant coronary artery disease on CT (coronary stenosis >50%) will be compared to an adjudicated diagnosis derived from clinical data and other diagnostic tests based on the SOC strategy. Costs for the SOC evaluation will be collected and compared to a CT-based evaluation. Patients will be followed for 3 years after enrollment to evaluate prognosis.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Low to intermediate risk of angina with a TIMI ACS Risk Score ≤ 4
  • chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of ACS within 24 hours
  • male ≥30 years or female ≥45 years old
  • at least one cardiac risk factor
  • no obvious cause for symptoms.

排除标准

  • known CAD
  • ST segment elevation, new left bundle branch block or dynamic ECG changes
  • creatinine ≥1.8 g/dL
  • pregnant or lactating female
  • hemodynamic or respiratory instability
  • ongoing bronchospasm
  • known iodinated contrast allergy
  • atrial fibrillation or irregular heart rate

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy of CT compared to standard of care evaluation

时间窗: 3 months

次要结局

  • Cost savings of CT-based evaluation compared to the standard of care evaluation(3 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Kelley Branch

Assistant Professor

University of Washington

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验