a clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of two mouthrinses to treat gum diseases in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treament
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R68- Other general symptoms and signsHealth Condition 2: R688- Other general symptoms and signs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/10/016100
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Nikita Patil
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 80
1) Minimum of 20 teeth should be present in the dentition .
2) Patients with fixed orthodontic appliances
3) Patients classified as stage II and stage III gingivitis based upon the gingival score given by Loe and Silness 1964.
4)Patient with clinical bleeding on probing present.
5) Patient willing to give the informed consent and willing to comply with the study were selected
1)Allergy or hypersensitivity to Chlorhexidine or related compounds.
2)Use of antibiotics within last 3 months.
3)Periodontal pockets >4mm.
4)systemic diseases.
5)Pregnancy.
6)Smoking
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 3. To Compare the efficacy of freshly prepared synbiotic mouthrinse and freshly prepared probiotic mouthrise on plaque induced gingivitis in patient with fixed orthodontic appliancesTimepoint: baseline, 1month.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. To Compare the efficacy of Chlorhexidine mouthrinse(0.12%) and freshly prepared probiotic mouthrise on plaque induced gingivitis in patient with fixed orthodontic appliances <br/ ><br>2. To Compare the efficacy of Chlorhexidine mouthrinse(0.12%) and freshly prepared Synbiotic mouthrise on plaque induced gingivitis in patient with fixed orthodontic appliances patients <br/ ><br>Timepoint: baseline, 1month.;4. To Compare the efficacy of warm saline rinse and all of the above on plaque induced gingivitis in patient with fixed orthodontic appliancesTimepoint: baseline, 1month.