跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2010/091/001036
CTRI/2010/091/001036已完成4 期

A randomized double blind Trial comparing Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine vs. Amitriptyline in painful Diabetic Neuropathy

PGIMER2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2008年11月17日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
PGIMER
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Percentage of patients showing improvement by patient assessment of efficacy by visual analogue scale was done. This was compared between the two treatment groups.

研究概览

简要总结

Painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy is a chronic complication of diabetes characterized by intractable pain, which mainly affects the foot. The currently available treatments have their own limitations. A randomized, double blind, active control, cross over clinical trial with optional dose up-titration to compare the efficacy and safety of duloxetine with amitriptyline in controlling peripheral neuropathic pain was conducted. Though 76 patients were included, 65 were randomized and only 58 reported after taking at least one dose of the treatment. The pain relief was observed in 80% and 79% patients on amitriptyline and duloxetine respectively by Visual analogue scale. Patient global assessment, McGill pain questionnaire and Likert pain scale showed significant improvement with both treatments from second week itself. Amitriptyline and duloxetine showed more than 50% relief in pain in 56% and 58% respectively. However, not much improvement in other symptoms like numbness and paraesthesia could be achieved. Adverse events were more observed for amitriptyline. Most patients preferred amitriptyline dose 25mg once daily and duloxetine was preferred as 60 mg once daily at bedtime. Although both drugs showed comparable efficacy, of the two therapies duloxetine was preferred over amitriptyline due to its better tolerable adverse effect profile. There were self reported events of constipation and uneasiness noticed with duloxetine compared to dry mouth, sedation, dizziness and uneasiness while on amitriptyline. Comparing the efficacy and safety of the two drugs, duloxetine emerges as a better alternative due to comparable efficacy and a more tolerable adverse event profile. However, the cost may be the limiting factor and needs to be considered, especially in patients tolerable to amitriptyline.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Permuted block randomization, fixed
盲法
Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 75.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Inclusion criteria
  • Presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • No change in anti-diabetic medication for the last 1 month
  • Evidence of diabetic neuropathy by Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom Score >1 point, Diabetic Neuropathy Examination Score >4 point, Vibration perception test and monofilament test.
  • Neuropathic pain present for at least 1 month
  • Mean pain intensity of more than 50% by patient assessment by VAS.

排除标准

  • Exclusion criteria
  • Age below 18 or above 75 years
  • Evidence of renal disease (Se. creatinine > 1.5)
  • Evidence of liver disease (deranged LFT with clinical evidence)
  • Pregnant and lactating mothers and women intending pregnancy
  • Evidence of other causes for neuropathy and painful conditions
  • Epilepsy, psychiatric and cardiac diseases, hypertensives not on treatment, peripheral vascular disease and substance abuse.
  • Intake of anticonvulsants, antidepressants, membrane stabilizers and opioids
  • Participation in any other clinical trial with in the last 30 days.

结局指标

主要结局

Percentage of patients showing improvement by patient assessment of efficacy by visual analogue scale was done. This was compared between the two treatment groups.

时间窗: Baseline (0), 2,4 6 weeks

次要结局

  • Comparison of the following scores between patients for painful diabetic neuropathy-(1. Short form McGill pain questionnaire)

研究者

发起方
PGIMER
申办方类型
Other [Post Graduate Institute Under Government of India]

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

A clinical trial to study and compare the effects of... | 临床试验