MedPath

Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement in Colorectal,Coloanal and Ileoanal Anastomoses

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Diverticulitis
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Ulcerative Colitis
Interventions
Device: GORE SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement
Procedure: Staple line without reinforcement
Registration Number
NCT00663819
Lead Sponsor
W.L.Gore & Associates
Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this prospective, randomized multicenter center study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of colorectal, coloanal and ileoanal anastomoses reinforced with a bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement material compared with standard non-reinforced colorectal, coloanal and ileoanal techniques with respect to the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture and time to ileostomy closure, if applicable.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized prospective trial that compares the use of GORE SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement (CBSG) to standard stapling techniques in colorectal resections. The potential exists to utilize CBSG as a means of lowering the rate of post-operative anastomotic leakage and bleeding in high-risk colorectal, coloanal, and ileoanal anastomoses.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
258
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects who will undergo restorative proctectomy or proctocolectomy (<10 cm from anal verge) with a low circular stapled colorectal, coloanal or ileoanal anastomosis with or without reservoir, including treatment for rectal cancer, ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis

    , diverticulitis, perforation of the bowel/trauma.

  • Subjects undergoing Hartmann's reversal with restorative proctectomy (<10 cm from the anal verge).

  • Subjects may or may not have a diverting loop ileostomy as a component of their initial surgery.

  • Subjects who meet the requirements of number 1 and 2, and are being treated for rectal cancer may or may not have preoperative chemoradiation therapy in the treatment of their rectal cancer.

Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects being treated for rectal cancer with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Subjects who have significant intraoperative hypotension or cardiac events.
  • Subjects with collagen vascular disease, coagulopathy, significant renal or hepatic dysfunction (creatinine >1.6 or liver enzymes > 50% upper limit of normal values).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
DeviceGORE SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line ReinforcementGORE SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement configured for circular staplers
Procedure/SurgeryStaple line without reinforcementProcedure/Surgery: colorectal, coloanal, and ileoanal anastomotic staple line without reinforcement
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of Subjects Who Experience a Clinical and/or Radiologic Anastomotic LeakCompletion of procedure through 4-12 weeks post procedure

The primary endpoint for the study is the proportion of subjects who experience a clinical and/or radiologic anastomotic leak through 4 - 12 weeks post procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Identify and Compare the Rate of Anastomotic Stenosis Associated With Circular Stapled Anastomoses Constructed With and Without CBSG.Post operative
Determine the Rate of Significant Staple Line Hemorrhage With and Without the Use of CBSG in Circular Stapled AnastomosesPost operative
Determine the Efficacy and Further Substantiate Safety of CBSG Used in Conjunction With Circular Staplers When Performing High-risk Colorectal, Coloanal, and Ileoanal Anastomoses.Within 4 - 12 weeks post-surgery

Compare th number of patients experiencing significant post-operative complications when performing high-risk colorectal, coloanal, and Ileoanal anastomoses across both groups studied.

Trial Locations

Locations (16)

John Stroger Hospital of Cook County

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

New York Presbyterian Hospital

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Medical Center

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

University of South Florida-Cleveland Clinic Florida

🇺🇸

Weston, Florida, United States

University of Utah Health Sciences Center and Huntsman Cancer Hospital

🇺🇸

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Colon and Rectal Surgery-NEICRS Group

🇺🇸

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Advocate Healthcare/Good Shepard Hospital

🇺🇸

Barrington, Illinois, United States

Spectrum Health -Ferguson Group

🇺🇸

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

University of South Alabama

🇺🇸

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Peoria Surgical Group

🇺🇸

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Kenderick Regional Center

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Texas Endosurgery Institute

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Duluth Clinic

🇺🇸

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Albany Medical College

🇺🇸

Albany, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath