Comparison of Clinical Performance and Safety of Zirconia vs. Titanium Implants: a Multi-national RCT.
- Conditions
 - Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
 
- Registration Number
 - NCT03908177
 
- Lead Sponsor
 - Institut Straumann AG
 
- Brief Summary
 A post-market, multi-centre, prospective, open, randomized-controlled, non-inferiority clinical study to compare short-term performance and safety of the Straumann PURE 2-piece Ceramic Implant with Straumann Bone Level Implant using a fully digital workflow.
- Detailed Description
 To compare short-term performance and safety of the Straumann PURE 2-piece Ceramic Implant with Straumann Bone Level Implant using a fully digital workflow. Post-market, multi-centre, prospective, open, randomized-controlled, non-inferiority clinical study investigating patients in need of dental implant therapy for single-tooth gap rehabilitation. The follow up time is1 year after final crown restoration.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
 - ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
 
- Sex
 - All
 
- Target Recruitment
 - 124
 
- 
Patients must have voluntarily signed the Informed Consent Form before any study related procedures are performed, are willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits and agree that the pseudonymized data will be collected, analysed, and published.
 - 
Patients must be males or females who are a minimum of 18 years of age.
 - 
Patients, who are in need of a single tooth replacement with a dental implant in the premolar-to-premolar area in the mandible or maxilla (excluding lower incisors).
 - 
Presence of natural teeth on both sides of the study implant position and opposing dentition (single tooth gap).
 - 
Patients with healed extraction sockets, which means that at implant surgery:
- Soft tissue coverage of the socket is complete; and
 - Alveolar bone is reconsolidated (around 16 weeks after tooth extraction).
 
 
- Patients with inadequate bone volume where major bone augmentation would be required at implant location.
 - Inadequate anatomic situation that would prevent prosthetic-driven planning based on CBCT.
 - Presence of implants neighbouring the study implant.
 - Patients with inadequate oral hygiene (FMPS ≥ 20%).
 - Patients with local root remnants.
 - Patients with inadequate wound healing capacity.
 - Patients with incomplete maxillary and mandibular growth.
 - Patients with medical contraindications to implant surgery (uncontrolled bleeding disorders, psychoses, prolonged therapy-resistant functional disorders, xerostomia, weakened immune system, illnesses requiring periodic use of steroids or uncontrollable endocrine disorders.
 - Patients with drug or alcohol abuse.
 - Patients with allergies or hypersensitivity to zirconium oxide (ZrO2), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), hafnium dioxide (HfO2), aluminium oxide (Al2O3), and titanium (Grade 4).
 - Patients with medical contraindications to implant surgery (uncontrolled bleeding disorders, psychoses, prolonged therapy-resistant functional disorders, xerostomia, weakened immune system, illnesses requiring periodic use of steroids or uncontrollable endocrine disorders).
 - Patients with conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the Investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability.
 - Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant at any point during the study duration.
 
Furthermore, patients with uncontrolled periodontitis and less than 3 mm of keratinized mucosa at the day of surgery will be excluded from the study. Controlled periodontitis is defined as treated periodontitis with two or less pockets that are < 4 mm in depth or the existence of ≤ 20% bleeding on probing.
If the planned implant position is the second premolar, the adjacent molar must be present. Shortened arches with missing molars are not eligible in such a case.
Study & Design
- Study Type
 - INTERVENTIONAL
 
- Study Design
 - PARALLEL
 
- Primary Outcome Measures
 Name Time Method Bone Level Change 12 months after implant loading (final crown restoration) Change in crestal bone level measured by analysis of standardized peri-apical xrays 12 months after loading \[mm\].
- Secondary Outcome Measures
 Name Time Method Implant survival 12 months after loading. Implant survival rates 3, 6 months and 1 year after loading: yes/no
14 item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) 12 months after loading. The local language version of the OPHIP-14 is a self-reported questionnaire that measures dysfunction, discomfort and disability attributed to oral conditions. The questionnaire focuses on seven dimensions of impact: Functional limitation; Pain; Psychological discomfort; Physical disability; Psychological disability; Social disability; Handicap. The patients will be asked to respond according to frequency of impact on a 5-point Likert scale coded never (score 0), hardly ever (score 1), occasionally (score 2), fairly often (score 3) and very often (score 4).
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
 Dusseldorf University Hospital, Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
🇩🇪Düsseldorf, Germany
The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Implantology Institute
🇵🇹Lisboa, Portugal
Dusseldorf University Hospital, Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik🇩🇪Düsseldorf, Germany
