A Study To Compare two supraglottic devices for blind intubatio
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/12/016682
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of anaesthesiology
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists
(ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia
requiring endotracheal intubation will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients having
1.Respiratory or pharyngeal pathology
2.Restricted mouth Opening( <2.5cm)
3.Body mass index ( >35kg/m2)
4.Gastroesophageal reflux disease, upper GIT surgery or pathology
5.Surgery in position other than supine
will be excluded from study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Success rate of blind tracheal intubation through Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway versus Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask using Parker flex tip tube.Timepoint: Once - At the time of intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method umber of attempts, Ease and insertion time for intubationTimepoint: Once - at time of intubation