A Study of ALT-801 in Combination With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Muscle Invasive or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
- Conditions
- Urethra CancerTransitional Cell Carcinoma of BladderUreter CancerMalignant Tumor of Renal Pelvis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01326871
- Lead Sponsor
- Altor BioScience
- Brief Summary
This is a Phase Ib/II, open-label, multi-center, competitive enrollment and dose-escalation study of ALT-801 in a biochemotherapy regimen either containing cisplatin and gemcitabine or containing gemcitabine alone in patients who have muscle invasive or metastatic urothelial cancer of bladder, renal pelvis, ureters and urethra. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD), and assess the anti-tumor response of ALT-801 in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine or ALT-801 in combination with gemcitabine alone. The pharmacokinetic profile of ALT-801 in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine will also be assessed. The study includes a dose escalation phase (Phase Ib) and a dose expansion phase (Phase II). Phase II has two treatment groups, Expansion Group 1 and Expansion Group 2. Expansion Group 2 is for platinum-refractory patients, consisting of two treatment arms based on the patient's renal function. Patients will enroll to Expansion Group 2 after stage 1 of the Group 1 expansion is complete.
- Detailed Description
Bladder cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in men and the ninth most common in women in the US, with an estimated 68,810 new cases and 14,070 deaths for the year 2008. Approximately 90% to 95% of newly diagnosed patients are with transitional cell carcinomas (TCC). Approximately 20% to 25% contain advanced (muscle invasive or metastatic) disease. Muscle invasive bladder cancer is life threatening. Clinical trials have demonstrated that TCC is a chemotherapy-sensitive malignancy. Most current cancer treatment strategies involve the use of chemotherapeutic or biological drugs that have a low therapeutic ratio. The limitations are a consequence of effects of the therapeutic drug on normal tissues. One approach to control systemic exposure effects is to target the drug itself into the site of the tumor. For example, antibodies have been developed for use as tumor targeting agents and have had success in the clinic. However, despite the promise of antibody-based immunotherapy, there are limitations with these class of reagents. Even so, immunotherapy remains a promising approach to treat cancer.
One strategy that has received attention is treatment with cytokines such as IL-2 to enhance anti-tumor immunity. IL-2 has stimulatory effects on a number of immune cell types including T and B cells, monocytes, macrophages, lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAK) and natural killer (NK) cells. Based on the ability of IL-2 to provide durable curative anti-tumor responses, systemic administration of IL-2 has been approved to treat patients with metastatic melanoma or renal carcinoma. Unfortunately, the considerable toxicity associated with this treatment makes it difficult to achieve an effective dose at the site of the tumor and limits the population that can be treated. Thus, there is critical need for innovative strategies that enhance the effects of IL-2, to reduce its toxicity without compromising the clinical benefit, and to treat other diagnoses.
The study drug, ALT-801, is a biologic compound of interleukin-2 (IL-2) genetically fused to a humanized soluble T-cell receptor directed against the p53-derived peptides expressed on tumor cells. The p53 protein is one of the most important factors that protects from developing cancer and is also one of the most frequently mutated genes in many cancers, which include muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For any given cancer type, p53 dysfunction generally correlates with poor prognosis versus other the same site-of-origin. In some tumors, p53 mutation and over-expression also is associated with resistance to chemotherapy. This study is to further evaluate whether directing IL-2 activity using ALT-801 to the patient's tumor sites that over-express p53 results in clinical benefits
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 68
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ALT-801 0.06 mg/kg with Gemcitabine ALT-801 - ALT-801 0.06 mg/kg with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine ALT-801 - ALT-801 0.04 mg/kg with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine ALT-801 - ALT-801 0.04 mg/kg with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Cisplatin - ALT-801 0.04 mg/kg with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Gemcitabine - ALT-801 0.06 mg/kg with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Cisplatin - ALT-801 0.06 mg/kg with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Gemcitabine - ALT-801 0.06 mg/kg with Gemcitabine Gemcitabine -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Objective Response Rate in Treated Patients 12 weeks Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST V1.0\]: a complete response is the disappearance of all target lesions; a partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR = CR + PR.
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and/or the Recommended Dose (RD) for Dose Expansion of ALT-801 in Combination With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine or ALT-801 in Combination With Gemcitabine Alone 8 weeks Number of Participants With Adverse Events 8 weeks Number of AEs that occur or worsen after the first dose of study treatment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (16)
UPMC Cancer Center
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
The University of Arizona Cancer Center
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
UF Health Center at Orlando Health
🇺🇸Orlando, Florida, United States
Martin Health System
🇺🇸Stuart, Florida, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Karmanos Cancer Center
🇺🇸Detroit, Michigan, United States
University of Minnesota
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center
🇺🇸Fairway, Kansas, United States
Emory University
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Robert Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
🇺🇸Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Washington University
🇺🇸Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Science Center
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Levine Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network
🇺🇸Easton, Pennsylvania, United States