跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/08/072383
CTRI/2024/08/072383尚未招募不适用

Effectiveness of Kinesio taping versus rigid taping with common use of cryotherapy in athletes with Medial tibial stress syndrome

Rupam Nandi1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2024年8月23日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

研究概览

简要总结

INTRODUCTION

Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) is a common complaint among athletes, particularly in distance runners. Medial tibial stress syndrome is a frequent overuse lower extremity injury in athletes. MTSS is exercise-induced pain over the anterior tibia and is an early stress injury in the continuum of tibial stress fracture. MTSS do not usually manifest themselves in the same location. Pain is more common in the distal third of the tibia on the medial side or in the proximal region, as well as the anterior, posterior, lateral or medial side of the leg.

Generally, the risk factors causing this syndrome are divided into two group: intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors. Extrinsic risk factors are related to the duration and intensity of exercises, history of activity, inappropriate shoes, and hard and uneven surfaces. Intrinsic factors also include an increase in body mass, a decrease in the foot arch, a drop in navicular, an increase in foot pronation, an increase in range of motion of ankle planter flexion, an increase in external rotation of the hip joint during flexion in men, kinematic changes in the forefoot and hindfoot and high and prolonged soleus muscle activity during the acceleration phase of running and biomechanical alterations when running.

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Medial tibial stress syndrome in athletes generally involves one or more of several pathological, anatomically specific processes.

1.Bone stress

2.Vascular insufficiency

3.Inflammation

4.Raised intracompartmental pressure

5.Nerve entrapment (e.g. superficial peroneal nerve)

MEDIAL TIBIAL STRESS SYNDROME SYMPTOMS

Soreness or pain in the medial side of the tibia, more commonly in the distal region. A common source of pain is the central section of the medial tibia. On the other hand, medial tibial stress syndrome can affect the entire length of the leg. It is usual to describe lateral side soreness as dull and unpleasant. On movement, pain increases, and at rest, pain is subsided; it most commonly occurs at the initiation of a workout and lessens as the workout continues. The pain is usually more substantial the following day, but it will go away gradually. Pain can be felt even while the patient rests in severe and persistent MTSS, shin bone may be tender to the touch. Radiation to the foot, as well as dysesthesia, has been observed. Mild oedema with subcutaneous thickening of the tibial line can also be seen in MTSS patients.

Pain from medial tibial stress syndrome can:

•Commonly be felt on the inner lower part of the leg or front of the shin bone.

•Start off as come-and-go discomfort with activity and progress to a steady and persistent pain even after the activity has ended.

•Dull ache type of pain.

•Get worse after activity.

RATIONALE OF THE STUDY

Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) is an injury caused by vigorous exercise along the posterior medial part of the tibia. It is one of the most common problems of athletes and is considered one of the most prevalent overuse-induced pain in this population. The condition characterized by pain along the postero-medial aspect of the distal two-thirds of the tibial that occurs before, during or after activity.

The exact cause and pathophysiology behind medial tibial stress syndrome are still unclear. Repetitive stress that generates microdamage beyond the repair threshold could be a mechanism for developing medial tibial stress syndrome.

The treatment of medial tibial stress syndrome focuses on providing symptomatic relief and modifying the risk factors. In recent years, two approaches to medial tibial stress syndrome have gained popularity: the Kinesio Taping and the Rigid Taping, both of which often use with cryotherapy.

While both approaches have been shown to be effective in medial tibial stress syndrome rehabilitation, there is limited research comparing the two approaches with cryotherapy. Therefore, a study comparing the efficacy of the two approaches with cryotherapy would be valuable in determining the optimal rehabilitation protocol for medial tibial stress syndrome in athletes.

The effect of Kinesio Taping and Rigid Taping has been documented in several literatures. The study which has been done earlier was only for short-term (for 3 days). There has been no significant improvement noted with Kinesio Taping and Rigid Taping. Therefore, in this study we want to compare the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping and Rigid Taping for reducing the pain.

The rationale for conducting such a study is two-fold. First, understanding the relative efficacy of different rehabilitation approaches can help clinicians make informed decisions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individual patients. Secondly, as medial tibial stress syndrome rehabilitation can be a lengthy and costly process, identifying the most effective approach can help reduce the duration and cost of rehabilitation.

Overall, a study comparing the Kinesio Taping and Rigid Taping approaches with cryotherapy in medial tibial stress syndrome rehabilitation would provide valuable insights into the most effective and efficient rehabilitation protocols for medial tibial stress syndrome in athletes.

RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS

NULL HYPOTHESIS (Ho): There will be no significant difference between the Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping vs Rigid Taping with common use of cryotherapy in athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome.

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS (H1): There will be significant difference between the Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping vs Rigid Taping with common use of cryotherapy in athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome.

Athletes will be fully informed about the treatment procedure and written consents will be collected from the athletes. 30 athletes diagnosed by Medial tibial stress syndrome randomly selected by inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. The athletes will be conveniently selected and randomly allocated into two groups equally, Group A and Group B. Each group will contain 15 athletes. Pre-treatment scores will be taken from subjects, which will include assessment of Numeric pain rating scale. After completion of a treatment period of 4 weeks, post treatment scores will be taken to find out the difference between the pre and post treatment scores.

TREATMENT PROCEDURE

Group A: Each patient of this group will be treated with Kinesio Taping along with Cryotherapy. This treatment protocol will be done 3 sessions in a week for up to 4 weeks. Cryotherapy will be applied over entire leg by ice cube massage technique for 10 minutes. Thereafter, Kinesio Tape will be applied to the lower leg. The tail of a single Y-strip of Kinesio Tape will be placed on the proximal third of medial tibia. Each half of the Y-strip will be applied in a manner that they lay anterior and posterior to the medial malleolus and terminated under the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. No tension will be applied on the proximal and distal ends of the tape; while the remainder of the tape will be applied with 75% tension.

Group B: Each patient of this group will be treated with Rigid Taping along with Cryotherapy. This treatment protocol will be done 3 sessions in a week for up to 4 weeks. Cryotherapy will be applied over entire leg by ice cube massage technique for 10 minutes. A 6inch strip of white nonelastic adhesive tape will be torn and cut into a Y-shape. The tail of the tape will be placed on the base of the proximal third of the medial tibia, and the ends of the tape will be placed medial and lateral to the medial malleolus and terminated under the medial longitudinal arch of the foot.

EXPECTED OUTCOME

Both groups are expected to show improvement as 4 weeks of intervention should produce some results. However, they are statistically significant and if there will be any difference between the two interventions remains to be seen.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Other
盲法
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 30.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.Athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome clinically diagnosed by orthopaedician.
  • Players participating in regular training program presenting with history of pain located on the posteromedial border of the tibia induced by exercise that lasted for hours or days after exercise.
  • Diffuse tenderness/discomfort on palpation of the lower 1/3rd of posteromedial border of the tibia.
  • 4.Age limit: 18 to 30 years.
  • 5.Sex: Male and Female.
  • No history of paresthesia in involved extremity.

排除标准

  • Painful passive movement of the ankle.
  • History of fractures or surgery of the lower limb.
  • History of skin allergies to adhesive tape.
  • Preexisting skin conditions such as eczema, dermatitis, and psoriasis.
  • Positive tuning fork test for stress fracture and positive sphygmomanometer test for chronic compartment syndrome.

结局指标

主要结局

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

时间窗: 1st day of treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Rupam Nandi
申办方类型
Other [OPD of Physiotherapy College]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Rupam Nandi

Burdwan Institute of Medical and Life Sciences

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验