MedPath

Evaluation of the Effect of Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Dry Needling Therapy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Interventions
Procedure: The Control group
Procedure: The study group
Registration Number
NCT05821985
Lead Sponsor
Beni-Suef University
Brief Summary

The hypertonic dextrose injection; Prolotherapy is a proliferation injection therapy that aims to trigger a low-grade inflammatory response inside the (TMJ), with the resultant captivation of abundant fibroblasts that regenerate and strengthen the tendinous and ligamentous attachments and stabilize the disc and the fibro-osseous junctions.

On the other hand, dry needling' refers to the insertion of needles without the use of injectate. Dry needling is beneficial for treating a variety of neuromusculoskeletal pain syndromes as it represents a treatment modality for the ligaments and tendons, muscles, subcutaneous fascia, peripheral nerves, and neurovascular bundles. Deep dry needling (DDN) is a technique that utilizes the Intracapsular insertion of dry needles to approach the discal insertion to the lateral pterygoid muscle and the masseteric muscle origin, along the zygomatic bone and arch, aiming to inactivate the muscular trigger points (TPs).

Detailed Description

The Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) represents the most complex synovial articulation in the human body, with its articular disc enclosed between the articular tubercle's slope and the convexity of the mandibular condyle.

Although the Magnetic resonance interpretation of the normal discal position defines the posterior discal band atop the highest convexity of the mandibular condyle, at a 12 o'clock position, this discal disposal is altered in almost 30% of the population without physical signs. Which rendered the treatment of the discal displacement mainly dependent on alleviating the signs and symptoms rather than restoring the anatomical disc position.

Various non-invasive therapeutic modalities are utilized for relieving the signs and symptoms of anterior discal displacement, including physical therapy, exercises, ischemic compression, heat therapy, acupuncture, dry needling, wet needling injections with different agents, and pharmacological treatments.

Among those, the trigger point injection is an effective modality, with or without the injection of saline or ringer's solutions, hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, botulinum toxin, platelet-rich plasma, or hypertonic dextrose The current study aims to design a randomized controlled trial that compares the effect of injecting 12.5 % of dextrose solution intraarticular and into the myofascial trigger points versus the dry needling of the same sites on alleviating the clinical signs and symptoms of (TMJ) disc displacement with reduction.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients of both genders with an age group of 18-45 years.
  2. Those patients with the radiographic interpretation of temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction (MRI) and the clinical signs of pain, limitation of mouth opening, and TMJ clicking.
  3. The presence of associated myofascial pain with masseteric trigger points (TPs)
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Any previous temporomandibular joint treatment.
  2. Any systemic disease affecting the temporomandibular joint's anatomy, mechanical function, or outcome of the proposed treatment.
  3. Those Patients with a history of allergic reactions to any components of the injectable solution

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
The Control groupThe Control groupPatients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution.
The Study groupThe study groupThe patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
clicking8 months

(evident or not)

Interincisal opening8 months

distance by cm caliber from the between the anterior teeth at the maximal unassisted nonpainful opening of the patient.

Pain threshold8 months

by using visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 which 10 is the worst pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Beni-suef university

🇪🇬

Banī Suwayf, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath