Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07261020
NCT07261020
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of the Effects of Reformer Pilates and Mat Pilates on Certain Physical and Functional Parameters in Women With Lumbar Disc Herniation

Uskudar University1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: January 5, 2024Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Uskudar University
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
quality of life scale short form

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of reformer pilates and mat exercise on pain, quality of life and kinesiophobia in female patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Detailed Description

The study began with patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation. Individuals were invited to participate based on inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were used to exclude individuals. Individuals were evaluated twice in this study. Treatment methods were applied. Mat Pilates was applied to one of the diagnosed groups, and reformer Pilates was applied to the other. Twenty participants were assigned to the mat Pilates group and 20 to the equipment Pilates group. A total of 40 patients participated. Pre- and post-treatment assessments were conducted using the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale, Short Form Quality of Life Scale, and Visual Analog Scale.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

quality of life scale short form

Time Frame: 10 weeks

The scale assessing quality of life consists of 36 questions. It rates health on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating poor health and 100 indicating good health.

Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale

Time Frame: 10 weeks

The scale consists of 17 questions. It includes parameters for injury/re-injury and fear-avoidance in work-related activities. Each question is scored using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score is calculated by reverse-scoring questions 4, 8, 12, and 16. A higher score is interpreted as indicating a higher level of kinesiophobia.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Uskudar University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Doç.Dr.Ömer Şevgin

Assoc.Prof.Dr.

Uskudar University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials