跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02398006
NCT02398006Unknown不适用

Figure-of-eight Bandage Versus Arm Sling for Treating Middle Third Clavicle Fractures in Adults: Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein0 个研究点目标入组 110 人开始时间: 2015年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
110
主要终点
Function or disability will be measured by DASH - Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

Background: Fracture of the clavicle is common accounting for 2.6% to 4 % of all fractures, with an overall incidence of 36.5 to 64 per 100,000 per year. Around 80% of clavicle fractures occur in the middle third of the clavicle. There is a lack of evidence of randomised controlled trials assessing the best treatment of these fractures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects (benefits and harms) of conservative interventions: figure-of-eight bandage versus sling for the treating middle third clavicle fractures. Methods/Design: this project has been designed as a single-centre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial that will compare figure-of-eight bandage versus sling. The investigators aim to recruit 110 adults, aged 18 years or older, with an acute (less than 10 days) middle third clavicle fracture. Primary outcomes will be function or disability measured by DASH questionnaire; the secondary outcomes will be: modified UCLA score pain, treatment failure, adverse events and numbers returning to previous activities. Data analysis: the chi-square test will be used to analyse the results of categorical variables, and Student t-test will be used to compare groups with respect to the numerical variables. The Student t-test is used to compare the clinical outcome of each group at 1, 2 and 4 weeks and at 6 and 12 months after the intervention. The significance level of 5% (alpha = 0.05) is used for all statistical tests such that tests have a value of less than 0.05 are considered statistically significant. Discussion: According to current evidence there is very limited evidence from two single trials only regarding the effectiveness of different methods of conservative interventions for treating clavicle fractures. This study is one of the first randomised controlled trials following the CONSORT statements designed to compare two conservative methods for treating clavicle fractures (figure-of-eight versus sling).

详细描述

Whilst there are several options for conservative treatment for middle third clavicle fractures, only two randomised controlled published in the 80s attempted to determine the effects of different methods for conservative treatment for middle third clavicle fractures. Thus, a pragmatic trial design has been chosen as it can directly inform clinical practice; our inclusion criteria will reflect the variety in patient presentations that would be encountered by general orthopaedic surgeons in the clinical setting. The current trial includes design characteristics known to minimise bias. Participants will be assigned using a concealed random procedure, assessments and data analysis will be blinded and we will use the intention-to-treat analysis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults aged 18 years or older and 65 years or less with middle third clavicle fracture,
  • Acute fracture (less than 10 days), we will include all types of middle third clavicle fractures (non-displaced and displaced fractures),
  • No medical contraindication to proposed methods of immobilisation,
  • Understanding of Portuguese language and written informed consent.

排除标准

  • Pathological fracture,
  • Open fracture,
  • Neurovascular injury on physical examination,
  • Associated head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score of <12),
  • Ipsilateral upper limb fractures and/or dislocation(except hand and fingers),
  • History of frozen shoulder,
  • Previous disease in the limb that could influence the results (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis),
  • Inability to comply with follow-up (inability to read or complete forms).

结局指标

主要结局

Function or disability will be measured by DASH - Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire

时间窗: 12 months

Function or disability will be measured by DASH - Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire validated and translated into Portuguese in Brazil, the final score of the DASH questionnaire will be converted to a percentage via the following formula: Scoring = \[Sum of answers n/n - 1\] X 25, where n is the number of complete answers. The two optional modules will not be measured. The value obtained will be directly proportional to the percentage of impairment of the limb function.

次要结局

  • Modified University of California at Los Angeles (modified - UCLA)(12 months)
  • Pain measured on a 0 to 100 using visual analogue scale (VAS)(12 months)
  • Treatment failure measured by the number of participants who have undergone or are being considered a surgical intervention(12 months)
  • Adverse events(12 months)
  • Numbers returning to previous activities (work, sport, activities of daily living), including time to return.(12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mario Lenza

Dr

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

相似试验