Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04655365
NCT04655365
Active, not recruiting
Phase 2

Detection and Monitoring of Metastasis by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Subjects Starting Enzalutamide for Untreated Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer and Negative, Equivocal, or Oligometastatic Disease on Conventional Imaging (PROSTEP-002)

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval4 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentMarch 22, 2022

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Enzalutamide capsule
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Sponsor
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Enrollment
50
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Determine the percentage of patients presenting new metastatic lesions detected by 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT in castration resistant prostate cancer patients presenting non metastatic, equivocal or oligometastatic (< 5 metastasis) disease
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
4 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL (PyL) PET/CT in subjects presenting not previously treated for castration resistant prostate cancer and showing negative or equivocal findings per institutional standard of care conventional imaging

Detailed Description

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid organ cancer in North American men and is initially androgen sensitive. Therefore, castration and/or androgen receptor blockade remains the central palliative treatment once PCa has metastasized or failed to locoregional therapies. Because androgen deprivation therapy is not curative, all patients will eventually progress to the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer state. About 5% of prostate cancers will be metastatic by conventional imaging techniques at diagnosis while most patients achieving CRPC state will first be localized and then progress to metastatic state later in the disease course. Therefore, a significant proportion of patients will progress through an intermediary state of disease defined as the non-metastatic CRPC state (M0CRPC). Over the last year and a half, M0CRPC treatment landscape has completely changed with demonstrating the benefits of second-generation antiandrogens (darolutamide, enzalutamide and apalutamide) to prevent progression of M0CRPC patients. Enzalutamide have then been approved by the Federal Drug Administration and Health Canada for the treatment of M0CRPC. On the other hand, conventional imaging techniques based on bone turnover (bone scan (BS)) or anatomical features (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT)) have important limitations and poor accuracy. Bone scans (BS) is the commonest imaging technique used to detect bone metastases in the clinics. BS does not image directly cancer cells, but the effect of cancer on the bone. Other pathologies such as fractures, degenerative arthritis and other benign bone lesions can also cause focal uptake on BS and lead to false-positive results. Another drawback of BS is its poor sensitivity to image small metastases confined to bone marrow. These limitations stress the importance to improve PCa imaging by using new imaging modalities. Because novel agents targeting the androgen synthesis and receptor axis (e.g. enzalutamide), bone metastasis (radium-223) and microtubules assembly (docetaxel, cabazitaxel) have been shown to increase metastatic CRPC patients overall survival, a burning question is to determine if the non-metastatic CRPC status is real. There is growing evidence that newer imaging techniques using positron emission tomography can improve metastasis detection accuracy and may refine PCa patient prognostic stratification and treatment eligibility.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 22, 2022
End Date
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
4 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
Male

Investigators

Sponsor
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate per original diagnosis, with undergoing androgen deprivation therapy such as prior bilateral orchiectomy or surgical castration or LHRH-agonists/LHRH-antagonists.
  • Suspected recurrence of prostate cancer based on rising PSA under androgen deprivation therapy. Recurrent castration resistant prostate cancer patients are defined by a rising PSA \>1 ng/mL under ADT or surgical castration and with testosterone castration levels \< 1.7 nM (PCWG3 criteria).
  • Negative, equivocal findings or oligometastatic disease (\< 5) for prostate cancer on conventional imaging bone scan AND 2) abdomen-pelvis CT/MRI and chest CT or FDG-PET/CT or 18F-NaF PET/CT performed as standard of care workup within 90 days of signing the ICF.
  • The subject is candidate for second line androgen axis targeted inhibitors such as enzalutamide and planned to receive it.
  • Life expectancy ≥6 months as determined by the investigator
  • Able and willing to provide signed informed consent and comply with protocol requirement
  • PSA doubling time less or equal to 10 months
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 at screening.
  • Able to swallow the study drug and comply with study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects administered any high energy (\>300 KeV) gamma-emitting radioisotope within 5 physical half-lives prior to study drug injection.
  • Receipt of investigational drug therapy for prostate cancer within 60 days of Day
  • Known or suspected brain metastasis or active leptomeningeal disease.
  • Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole, abiraterone acetate, or enzalutamide for prostate cancer.
  • History of seizure or any condition that may predispose to seizure (e.g., prior cortical stroke or significant brain trauma). History of loss of consciousness (unless of cardiac origin) or transient ischemic attack within 12 months before enrollment.
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks before randomization date.
  • Absolute neutrophil count \< 1000/μL, platelet count \< 100,000/μL, or hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL (6.2 mmol/L) at screening.
  • Total bilirubin ≥ 1.5-times the upper limit of normal or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 2.5-times the upper limit of normal at screening.
  • Creatinine \> 2 mg/dL (177 μmol/L) at screening.
  • Albumin \< 3.0 g/dL (30 g/L) at screening.

Arms & Interventions

Resistant Prostate Cancer and Negative, Equivocal or Oligometastatic Disease on Conventional Imaging

Enrolled subjects will receive a single dose of 9 mCi (333 MBq) 18F-DCFPyL Injection followed by a single PET/CT scan acquired at 1-2 hours post-dosing. After initial 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, the patients with positive 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging will be treated with enzalutamide (160 mg po id) for M0CRPC disease within less than two weeks. 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT scan will then be repeated 90 days after the start of enzalutamide treatment. A final follow-up imaging (18F-DCFPyL PET/CT) at progression or at the final follow-up imaging examination at 18 months after the new complete ICF or in September 2026 (whichever comes first) will be performed.

Intervention: Enzalutamide capsule

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Determine the percentage of patients presenting new metastatic lesions detected by 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT in castration resistant prostate cancer patients presenting non metastatic, equivocal or oligometastatic (< 5 metastasis) disease

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Number of patients presenting with metastases per compartment (bone, visceral, lymph node) determined by 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT that were negative or equivocal on conventional imaging. determined by 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT.

Determine the number of discordant lesions between conventional and PSMA-PET/CT imaging in castration resistant prostate cancer patients presenting with non metastatic, equivocal or oligometastatic (< 5 metastasis) disease defined by conventional imagi

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Number of metastases per compartment (bone, visceral, lymph node) that are discordant between conventional imaging and 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA -PET/CT.

Determine the percentage of patients showing 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT active lesions at progression (V5) that were active on either baseline and 3-month PSMA-PET/CT (extension phase)

Time Frame: through study extension phase completion, an average of 1 year

At V5, number of patients presenting with metastases determined by 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT that were active on either baseline and 3-month PSMA-PET/CT

In patients with 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT active lesions at progression (V5), determine the percentage of lesions that were NOT active on either baseline and 3-month PSMA-PET/CT (New lesions) (extension phase)

Time Frame: through study extension phase completion, an average of 1 year

Number of metastases per compartment (bone, visceral, lymph node) at V5 imaging that were NOT active on either baseline and 3-month PSMA-PET/CT. Number of metastases per compartment (bone, visceral, lymph node) that were active on either baseline and 3-month PSMA-PET/CT.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Determine the intrapatient and interpatient 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA response rates defined by a 50% decrease in intralesional 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA uptake or 50% decrease in sum metastasis 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA uptake after 3 months of enzalutamide.(At the end of study completion, an average of 2 years)
  • Determine the impact of 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT at progression (V5) on patient's management. (Extension phase)(through study extension phase completion, an average of 1 year)
  • In non-progressive patients defined by stable PSA, determine the percentage of patients showing active 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT lesions at V5. (extension phases)(through study extension phase completion, an average of 1 year)
  • Determine how 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT radiomics at baseline or 3 months after enzalutamide start can predict time to biochemical progression under enzalutamide. (extension phase)(through study extension phase completion, an average of 1 year)

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials