Take 2 Pills and Go Volunteer in the Morning: A Feasibility Study of Engaging Patients as Volunteers
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 50
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Total volunteer hours
Study Overview
Brief Summary
In this study, doctors will "prescribe" volunteer work for their patients. The investigators are determining whether it is feasible for providers to recommend volunteering to their patients, and whether patients who are recommended this "treatment" actually do volunteer work (i.e., find it "acceptable"). The study is focused on uninsured patients at Loyola Medicine's Access to Care (ATC) Clinic. The study's secondary aim is to determine whether or not engaging in volunteer work yields health benefits.
Detailed Description
In this feasibility study, doctors will "prescribe" volunteer work for their patients. The setting is Loyola Medicine's Access to Care Clinic, which serves patients who are low-income and uninsured (and often members of racial/ethnic minority groups). The investigators are determining whether it is feasible for providers in a low-resourced primary care setting to recommend volunteering to their patients, and whether patients who are recommended this "treatment" actually do volunteer work (and how much). The investigators are also interested in measuring whether volunteering is associated with any potential health benefits, specifically well-being and self-esteem.
Promoting volunteerism is the intervention because research evidence suggests that volunteer work may be good for one's health. For example, research shows that volunteering is associated with numerous potential health benefits: improved mental health, increased physical activity, higher preventive health care utilization, lower cardiovascular risk and lower mortality. Besides better health, volunteering also can teach valuable skills, help individuals meet others, and foster new relationships.
Despite all these potential benefits, rates of volunteering are low. Overall, just one in four people volunteers. Additionally, people who have lower incomes are less likely to volunteer (14% of people with incomes below $20,000 vs. 35% of people with incomes above $100,000. And minority groups are less likely to volunteer than whites (just 19% of African Americans and 15% of Latinos compared with 26% of Whites).
Thus, the intervention is aimed to increase volunteer participation rates among groups unlikely to volunteer: low-income uninsured persons who are members of racial/ethnic minority groups.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Non Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Health Services Research
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •* Access to Care patient
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Arms & Interventions
Volunteering
The experimental arm will receive a volunteer "prescription" from their provider and assistance from a study team member to find a volunteer job.
Intervention: Volunteering (Behavioral)
Control
The control arm will not be recommended to volunteer or assisted in finding a volunteer activity. They will answer the same survey questions as the intervention subjects.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Total volunteer hours
Time Frame: Baseline to six months
Investigators will sum the reported volunteer hours, which will be tracked at baseline and monthly for 6 months.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score(Baseline to six months)
- Change in the Arizona Integrative Outcomes Scale(Baseline to six months)
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Short Form Scale(Baseline to six months)
Investigators
Julie Darnell
Associate Professor
Loyola University
