MedPath

Comparison of 2 Techniques of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Malocclusion
Maxillar Hypoplasia
Transverse Maxillary Deficiency
Interventions
Procedure: Osteotomy between the maxillary central incisors
Procedure: Osteotomy between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines
Registration Number
NCT03503448
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto
Brief Summary

This study evaluates 2 Techniques of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SARME) in the treatment of maxillary transverse deficiency. Half of participants will undergo an osteotomy between the maxillary central incisors, while the other half will undergo an osteotomy between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines (bilateral osteotomies).

Detailed Description

Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SARME) can be performed by a osteotomy between the maxillary central incisors and by osteotomies between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines (bilateral).

Both techniques treat transverse maxillary hypoplasia, but they do so with different effects on esthetics, periodontium, teeth and bone expansion.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria

patients with bilateral cross-bite and bilateral transverse maxillary deficiencies equal to or greater than 6 mm -

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with previous histories of maxillary surgery, congenital craniofacial malformations, unilateral transverse maxillary deficiencies and absence of teeth in the maxilla.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
space between 11/21Osteotomy between the maxillary central incisorsOsteotomy between the maxillary central incisors
space between 12/13 and 22/23Osteotomy between the maxillary lateral incisors and caninesOsteotomy between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bone expansion and dental inclination1-2 months post-expansion.

Assessment of bone expansion and dental inclination through Cone Beam computed tomography (CBCT) images

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient´s perception2 months post-expansion.

Patient´s cosmetic perception of his or her smile on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where "0" represents total dissatisfaction and "10" represents total satisfaction with the postoperative smile.

Surgery timeDuring surgery

Time elapsed during surgery.

Periodontal effects2 months post-expansion.

Assessment of periodontal changes in the teeth adjacent to the segmentation, through periodontal probing

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto

🇧🇷

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath