MedPath

Timing of Preload Responsiveness in Sepsis

Recruiting
Conditions
Septic Shock
Fluid Responsiveness
Registration Number
NCT05627817
Lead Sponsor
Bicetre Hospital
Brief Summary

During acute circulatory failure, volume expansion does not always lead to a significant increase in cardiac output (fluid responsiveness). After initial resuscitation by rapid fluid administration, cardiac preload is no longer extremely low and only half of the patients respond to further volume expansion with the expected increase in cardiac output (fluid unresponsiveness). However, the time delay or the volume of fluid needed to be administered from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness is still not determined.

Objective To determine, in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure,

1. : the time and/or the volume of fluid needed from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness during septic shock.

2. : determine the factors that influence this time and volume.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥ 18 ans
  • Onset of septic shock
Exclusion Criteria
  • Planned to transfer the patient to another healthcare facility (inability to continue cardiac output measurements); urgent operation; Inability to measure the cardiac output.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The volume of fluid needed from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness15-30 minutes during the fluid administration

If the fluid challenge is performed, the volume of each time for the fluid administration should be noted until the patient is no longer fluid-responsive, then the investigators can calculate the total amount of the fluid administrated.

The time delay from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness60 minutes after the evaluation of fluid responsiveness

At the time of inclusion, the investigators use the tests available (fluid challenge, passive leg raising, end-expiratory occlusion test) to evaluate the presence of fluid responsiveness, and after one hour, the investigators repeat the test and to re-evaluate the presence of fluid responsiveness until the patient is no longer present the fluid responsiveness.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The risk factors for the volume of fluid needed from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluidThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Determine the factors that may influence the volume of fluid administrated from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness

The risk factors for the time delayThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Determine the factors that may influence the time delay from the state of fluid responsiveness to fluid unresponsiveness

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bicetre Hospital

🇫🇷

Paris, Val-de-Marne, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath