跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00147849
NCT00147849终止不适用

A Cluster Controlled Trial Comparing Three Methods of Disseminating Practice

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)0 个研究点开始时间: 2000年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
发起方
主要终点
Rate of hospital days per 1,000 disease episodes

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to identify, from a societal perspective, the costs and associated benefits of three strategies for disseminating and implementing a practice guideline that addresses the management of croup.

详细描述

Overall Aim: The overall aim of this study is to identify - from a societal perspective - the costs and associated benefits of three strategies for implementing a practice guideline that addresses the management of croup.

Intervention Strategies: The intervention strategies to be compared will be mailing of printed educational materials (the "Standard intervention"), mailing plus a combination of interactive educational meetings, educational outreach visits, and reminders (a "Saturn intervention"), and a combination of mailing, interactive sessions, outreach visits, reminders plus identification of local opinion leaders and establishment of local consensus processes (a "Cadillac intervention").

Primary Objective: To determine which of the three intervention strategies are most effective at lowering the rate of hospital days per 1,000 disease episodes. The null hypothesis is that none of the intervention strategies reduce hospital utilization rates from baseline. The alternate hypothesis is that the intervention strategies will have a graded degree of effect on hospitalization rates, with the 'Standard intervention' having minimal to no effect, the 'Saturn intervention' having moderate but significant effect, and the 'Cadillac intervention' having the greatest effect.

Secondary Objective: To determine which of the three dissemination strategies are most effective at increasing the use of therapies of known benefit.

Economic Analysis: To determine which of the three intervention strategies will most effectively reduce total societal costs including all health care costs, costs borne by the family, and costs stemming from the strategies for disseminating guidelines.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Educational Counseling Training
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
0 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Alberta hospitals were rank ordered based on the number of disease episodes and rates of hospitalization for a six-year period. We then approached in this order each of the hospital administrators and clinical staff for permission to include their hospital in our study until a total of 24 hospitals consented

排除标准

  • Refusal by hospital staff to participate in this trial

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of hospital days per 1,000 disease episodes

次要结局

  • Proportion of patients evaluated in ED for at least three hours after treatment with corticosteroids before the decision to admit to hospital is made.
  • Time to treatment with corticosteroids in both ED and hospital patients.
  • Proportion of patients treated in the ED and hospital with a corticosteroid.
  • An economic analysis conducted from a societal perspective with costs classified as either payer (costs born by the province) or non-payer (costs born by individuals or the families of children with croup).

研究者

发起方
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
申办方类型
Other Gov

相似试验