Suicide Prevention Training for PC Providers-in-training

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Suicide Prevention
• Interventions: Other: Didactic training; Other: Standardized patient interaction

• Registration Number: NCT02996344
• Lead Sponsor: University of Rochester

Brief Summary

This randomized control study responds to the need for effective suicide prevention education/training that is grounded in adult learning theory and advances in education, in the context of a changing health care landscape where primary care providers are likely to encounter suicidal individuals. The study will test the effectiveness of suicide prevention education for providers-in-training by comparing two conditions: 1) A Control learning group: includes suicide prevention didactics (Commitment to Living: Primary Care) delivered online via brief videos, and 2) An Experimental learning group: includes didactics plus two standardized patient (SP) interactions. One Experimental learning group SP interaction will be in person and the other will be conducted remotely using a secure webcam service (OoVoo). All SP interactions will be recorded. Both groups will be compared in terms of their suicide prevention skills using an SP 'test case' at 6-month follow up. The primary research question is to learn about the impact of practice (though SP simulation) over and above didactics alone.

Detailed Description

Suicide is a national public health crisis and a critical patient safety issue. Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death overall and, shockingly, the 2nd leading cause of death in adolescents and young adults (15-34 years old). 1 A recent U.S. study of suicide reported that 45% of individuals who died by suicide had contact with primary care services within one month before their death. 2 Another study found that 80% of youth who died by suicide saw their primary care provider within the year of their death. 3 Patient safety is compromised when primary care providers lack the knowledge and skills to assess and respond to patients at risk for suicide.

This randomized control study responds to the need for effective suicide prevention education/training that is grounded in adult learning theory and advances in education, in the context of a changing health care landscape where primary care providers are likely to encounter suicidal individuals. 4 We will test the effectiveness of suicide prevention education for providers-in-training by comparing two conditions: 1) A Control learning group: includes suicide prevention didactics (Commitment to Living: Primary Care) delivered online via brief videos, and 2) An Experimental learning group: includes didactics plus two standardized patient (SP) interactions. One Experimental learning group SP interaction will be in person and the other will be conducted remotely using a secure webcam service (OoVoo). All SP interactions will be recorded. Both groups will be compared in terms of their suicide prevention skills using an SP 'test case' at 6-month follow up. The primary research question is to learn about the impact of practice (though SP simulation) over and above didactics alone. The hypotheses are as follows:

H1: All subjects will demonstrate improved suicide prevention knowledge from pre to post didactics and maintain improvement 6 months after didactics.

H2: Subjects in the experimental learning group will report greater satisfaction with the training, greater self-efficacy in identifying and responding to patients at risk for suicide, greater intention to use, as well as use of suicide prevention skills.

H3: Subjects in the experimental learning group will also be more skillful in responding to patients at risk for suicide (in an SP interview, measured by objective observed ratings) compared to the control learning group 6 months after didactics.

Exploratory Aims: We will examine moderators of outcomes, differences among SP simulations (i.e., face-to-face vs. telehealth modalities), and if there is growth in improved skills observed over multiple SP experiences in the experimental learning group.

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2016-03-15
• Study First Submitted: 2016-10-24
• Study First Submitted QC: 2016-12-14
• Study First Posted: 2016-12-19
• Primary Completion: 2018-06-07
• Study Completion: 2018-06-07
• Status Verified: 2020-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-02-11
• Last Update Posted: 2020-02-12

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 132

Inclusion Criteria

• trainee in family medicine residency, pediatrics residency, or nurse practitioner program at URMC.
• speaks/writes English.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• on academic probation

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Didactics and standardized patients	Standardized patient interaction	Behavioral; participants will view the approximately one hour Commitment to Living: Primary Care (CTL:PC) didactic training videos plus two practice standardized patient interactions.
Didactics and standardized patients	Didactic training	Behavioral; participants will view the approximately one hour Commitment to Living: Primary Care (CTL:PC) didactic training videos plus two practice standardized patient interactions.
Didactic training	Didactic training	Behavioral; participants will view the approximately one hour Commitment to Living: Primary Care (CTL:PC) didactic training videos.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mean score using the Commitment to Living: Primary Care Observational Rating form	through study completion, an average of 6 months	Each participant will be evaluated via standardized patient interactions which are video taped and reliably coded using the Commitment to Living: Primary Care Observational Rating form. Score will range from 0 - 32.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Changes in suicide prevention self-efficacy	15 days from enrollment and through study completion, an average of 6 months	Participants will complete a 20-item 5-point likert scale self-efficacy questionnaire following the online didactic training and end of study. Average responses will be compared.
Changes in suicide prevention knowledge	15 days from enrollment and through study completion, an average of 6 months	Participants will complete a 17-item knowledge questionnaire following the online didactic training and end of study. Number of correct responses will be compared.
Feedback on training	through study completion, an average of 6 months	Participants will provide feedback on their experience with suicide prevention training on 15 items using a 5-point likert scale.
Number of participants intending to transfer training to practice	15 days from enrollment and through study completion, an average of 6 months	Participants will complete a 8-item intentions to use training in practice on a 5-item likert scale questionnaire following the online didactic training and end of study. Number of participants who report positive intentions to use the training in practice will be compared.
Use of suicide prevention skills	through study completion, an average of 6 months	Participants will self-report whether they used suicide prevention skills in practice on 0-4 point likert scale, with 0 defined as no use and 4 as frequently used.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Rochester Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Rochester, New York, United States