跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05893784
NCT05893784已完成不适用

The Effect of Progressive Relaxation Exercises Applied to Individuals With Diabetes on Fatigue and Sleep

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 63 人开始时间: 2022年1月20日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
63
试验地点
1
主要终点
Fatigue Severity Scale

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the progressive relaxation exercises applied to the individuals with diabetes on fatigue and sleep. This randomized controlled study was a single-blind, parallel intervention and control group experimental study. The researcher applied the training for the progressive relaxation exercises to the intervention group. Socio-demographic data, 'Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index' and 'The Fatigue Severity Scale' were used for the study.

详细描述

The study was conducted on patients who applied to the endocrine polyclinic of a hospital in Turkey and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. The patients were diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, were over 18 years old and were using insulin. The patients were able to communicate and had no disease that could prevent them from exercising.

The Intervention (n=33) and control groups (n=30) were formed by simple randomization method.

Data was collected by using "Patient Identification Form", "Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index" and "The Fatigue Severity Scale".

Patient Identification Form was created by scanning the literature for this study. In this form, there were 10 questions in total. The questions included the first letters of the name and surname of the patient for coding purposes. The other questions were about age, marital status, employment status, educational status, drinking and smoking habbits, participation in exercise training, exercise and sleep patterns.

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was developed by Buysse et al. in 1989. It was adapted into Turkish by Ağargün et al. in 1996 as PUKI. PUKI was a 24-item scale and it was used to evaluate sleep quality and disturbance of the previous month. 19 of the questions were self-report questions and those were answered by the patient. The question number 19 was about the availability of a roommate or spouse and it was not used in scoring. The remaining 5 questions of 24 were to be answered by a spouse or a roommate, they were also not included in the scoring. The 18 scored questions of the scale consisted of 7 components which were Subjective Sleep Quality, Sleep Latency, Sleep Duration, Habitual Sleep Efficiency, Sleep Disorder, Sleeping Drug Use, and Daytime Dysfunction. Each component was evaluated with a score between 0 and 3 points. The total score of the 7 components was accepted as the score of the scale. Therefore the total score of the scale was between 0 and 21 points. A total score greater than 5 was accepted to be "poor sleep quality". The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.80.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • using insulin
  • had no disease that could prevent them from exercising.

排除标准

  • Not having been diagnosed with diabetes

结局指标

主要结局

Fatigue Severity Scale

时间窗: a day before the education

Fatigue Severity Scale was cited as the best example among one-dimensional scales. This scale consisted of 9 questions in total and the person indicated how much he or she agreed with each question by choosing a value between 1 and 7 where 1 means I totally disagreed and 7 means I totally agreed. The score range of the scale was between 9 and 63 points. A score of 36 or higher indicated severe fatigue. The total score was calculated by taking the average of 9 answers. The cut-off value for pathological fatigue was determined as 4 and above.

Patient Identification Form

时间窗: a day before the education

Patient Identification Form was created by scanning the literature for this study. In this form, there were 10 questions in total. The questions included the first letters of the name and surname of the patient for coding purposes. The other questions were about age, marital status, employment status, educational status, drinking and smoking habbits, participation in exercise training, exercise and sleep patterns.

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

时间窗: a day before the education

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was a 24-item scale and it was used to evaluate sleep quality and disturbance of the previous month. 19 of the questions were self-report questions and those were answered by the patient. The question number 19 was about the availability of a roommate or spouse and it was not used in scoring. The remaining 5 questions of 24 were to be answered by a spouse or a roommate, they were also not included in the scoring. The 18 scored questions of the scale consisted of 7 components which were Subjective Sleep Quality, Sleep Latency, Sleep Duration, Habitual Sleep Efficiency, Sleep Disorder, Sleeping Drug Use, and Daytime Dysfunction. Each component was evaluated with a score between 0 and 3 points. The total score of the 7 components was accepted as the score of the scale. Therefore the total score of the scale was between 0 and 21 points. A total score greater than 5 was accepted to be "poor sleep quality".

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Bahar İNKAYA

Doç.Dr

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

The Effect of Progressive Relaxation Exercises... | 临床试验