Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02310776
NCT02310776CompletedNot Applicable

Breast Lesion Detection Using the Acuson S2000 Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) Compared With Handheld (HH) Physician-performed Ultrasound (US) Examinations

Northwestern University2 sites in 1 country501 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
501
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Ratio of Lesions Detected With Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABVS) Compared to the Standard of Care Handheld (HH) Breast Ultrasound (US)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Compare lesion detection of the automated breast ultrasound (ABVS) exam with the conventional handheld (HH) breast ultrasound (US) exam.

Detailed Description

This is a research study to test a FDA-approved automated breast ultrasound (ABVS) machine in subjects recommended for an ultrasound of the breast. The main purpose of the study is to compare images obtained from the automated breast ultrasound exam with the standard physician performed handheld breast ultrasound exam for lesion detection equivalence.

Each subject will have a bilateral hand-held breast ultrasound and a bilateral automated breast ultrasound, both exams preferably done on the same day. The hand-held ultrasound will be performed by a breast imaging physician participating in the study and the automated ultrasound exam will be performed by a sonographer.

There is no radiation risk from ultrasound. The physician performing the handheld breast ultrasound is blinded to the study, will not know the subject's history, but only the reason for the breast ultrasound exam.

The automated scan requires gentle pressure on the breast during a scan. Three basic views will be acquired for each breast, each scan lasting approximately one minute. Once all necessary views are acquired, the images will be sent to a remote workstation, where a second radiologist, also blinded to the results of the handheld study, will interpret the automated ultrasound.

Once all images and patient information are gathered, the study radiologists will review the previous images, if available, to provide the final result that will determine clinical management. Therefore, it is possible that the hand-held or automated ultrasound scan will lead to further evaluation of the breast and possibly a biopsy.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •anyone who is referred for an ultrasound of the breast

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Subjects whose breast thickness is greater than 6 cm.The maximum depth of image filed for the ABVS acquisition is 6 cm

Arms & Interventions

Automated & Handheld breast US exams

Other
  1. Automated breast ultrasound exam: 3D supine automated breast ultrasound scanner.
  2. Handheld breast ultrasound exam: High-resolution handheld breast ultrasound.

Intervention: Supine automated breast ultrasound scanner (Device)

Automated & Handheld breast US exams

Other
  1. Automated breast ultrasound exam: 3D supine automated breast ultrasound scanner.
  2. Handheld breast ultrasound exam: High-resolution handheld breast ultrasound.

Intervention: High-resolution handheld breast ultrasound (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Ratio of Lesions Detected With Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABVS) Compared to the Standard of Care Handheld (HH) Breast Ultrasound (US)

Time Frame: Time for performance of ABVS was measured separately from interpretation time. Time for performance of real time HH whole breast US was also measured. For HH US physician performed, performance included interpretation.

Solid lesions found on whole breast 3D supine automated breast ultrasound are compared in number and identity with solid lesions found using high resolution standard of care handheld breast ultrasound performed by physicians

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ellen Mendelson

MD, FACR, Lee F. Rogers Professor of Medical Education in Radiology, Professor of Radiology Feinberg School of Medicine

Northwestern University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials