Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of Donepezil Hydrochloride (HCl) (Aricept) In Treating Cognitive Dysfunction Exhibited By Children With Down Syndrome
- Registration Number
- NCT00570128
- Lead Sponsor
- Eisai Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether donepezil HCl is effective and safe in improving cognitive dysfunction exhibited by children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS). Effectiveness will be measured by rating communication, daily living skills, and social skills and relationships in subjects aged 10 to 17.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 129
- Ages 10 to 17 years old, weight more than or equal to 20 kg
- Male and female
- Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II)/Parent/Caregiver Rating Form (PCRF) standard composite score greater than (>) 55
- Diagnosis of DS (trisomy 21) documented by chromosomal analysis (karyotyping). If such documentation is not available at screening, karyotyping will be performed with the screening labs and must be documented prior to baseline visit.
- Naïve to approved or unapproved cholinesterase inhibitors is preferred however, prior use of these medications is allowed, provided that the medication was discontinued at least 3 months prior to screening and that it was not discontinued for lack of tolerability or efficacy or for the sole purpose of enrolling the subject in the study.
- Subjects residing in the community
- Must be expected to complete all procedures scheduled during the Screening and Baseline visits including all efficacy and safety parameters.
- Must speak English and be verbal and able to be understood most of the time and must not use other forms of communication, signs, symbol boards or devices to supplement his/her communication ability
- Must have a parent or other reliable caregiver who agrees to accompany the subject to all clinic visits, provide information about the subject as required by the protocol, and ensure compliance with the medication schedule
- a Parent or Caregiver must be a constant and reliable informant with sufficient contact with the subject to have detailed knowledge of the subject's adaptive behavior in order to be able to complete the VABS-II/PCRF accurately. The same individual should complete the form at every visit.
- Should be in good general health with no medical conditions that are considered both clinically significant and unstable
- Clinical laboratory values within normal limits or abnormalities considered not clinically significant by the investigator and sponsor
- Stable Type I (insulin-dependent) or Type II diabetes are eligible provided they are monitored regularly prior to and during the study to ensure adequate glucose control (fasting blood glucose <140 milligram per deciliter (mg/dl) and glycosylated hemoglobin [hemoglobin A1c] <8 percent (%) at screening).
- Thyroid disease also may be included in the study provided they are euthyroid and stable on treatment for at least 3 months prior to screening.
- History of seizure disorder is allowed provided that subjects are on stable treatment for at least 3 months and have not had a seizure within the past 6 months.
- Independent in ambulation or ambulatory aided (example, walker or cane, wheelchair), vision and hearing (eyeglasses and/or hearing aid permissible) sufficient for achieving VABS-II/PCRF composite standard scores >55 and for cooperating with examinations and the Test of Verbal Expression and Reasoning (TOVER).
- Ages <10 or >17 years
- Active or clinically significant conditions affecting absorption, distribution or metabolism of the study medication (example, inflammatory bowel disease, gastric or duodenal ulcers or severe lactose intolerance)
- Known hypersensitivity to piperidine derivatives or cholinesterase inhibitors
- Currently receiving cholinesterase inhibitors or who have received them in the 3 months prior to screening or with prior use >3 months prior to screening who stopped for lack of efficacy or tolerability
- No reliable parent or caregiver, or participants, or caregivers who are unwilling or unable to complete any of the outcome measures and fulfill the requirements of this study
- Clinically significant obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma untreated or not controlled by treatment within 3 months prior to screening
- Recent (less than or equal to 2 years) hematologic/oncologic disorders (mild anemia allowed)
- Evidence of active, clinically significant, and unstable gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, endocrine or cardiovascular system disease
- Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or any current primary psychiatric diagnosis other than DS (as per DSM-IV)
- Any condition which would make the subject or the caregiver, in the opinion of the investigator, unsuitable for the study
- Unsuitability which includes female subjects who have begun menstruation and are thus of child-bearing potential, who may be sexually active and who are not practicing an effective means of birth control.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Donepezil HCl Donepezil HCl - Placebo Placebo -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Change From Baseline in V-Scale Composite Score (Sum of 9 Sub-Domains) of Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Second Edition-Parent Caregiver Rating Form (VABS-II/PCRF) at Week 10-Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Baseline, Week 10 The VABS-II/PCRF instrument was used in this study to assess 3 domains (each with 3 sub-domains): communication (sub-domains: receptive, expressive, and writing), daily living skills (sub-domains: personal, domestic, community), and socialization (sub-domains: interpersonal relationships, play/leisure time, coping skills). Raw scores (2=always present, 1=sometimes present, 0=seldom or never present) rated by the parent/caregiver from each sub-domain were converted to standardized scores called V-scores, which are based on age and a national sample of normal children. Each sub-domain v-scale score ranged from 1 (weakness) to 24 (strength). V-scores for the 9 sub-domains were summed to obtain a composite V-score ranging from 9 to 216. Higher scores indicate a higher level of adaptive functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in adaptive functioning. Composite V-scores have a mean (50th percentile) of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Change From Baseline in V-Scale Composite Score (Sum of 9 Sub-domains) of Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Second Edition-Parent Caregiver Rating Form (VABS-II/PCRF) at Week 4 and 10-Observed Cases (OC) Baseline, Week 4 and Week 10 The VABS-II/PCRF instrument was used in this study to assess 3 domains (each with 3 sub-domains): communication (sub-domains: receptive, expressive, writing), daily living skills (sub-domains: personal, domestic, community), and socialization (sub-domains: interpersonal relationships, play/leisure time, coping skills). Raw scores (2=always present, 1=sometimes present, 0=seldom or never present) rated by the parent/caregiver from each sub-domain were converted to standardized scores called V-scores, which are based on age and a national sample of normal children. Each sub-domain v-scale score ranged from 1 (weakness) to 24 (strength). V-scores for the 9 sub-domains were summed to obtain a composite V-score ranging from 9 to 216. Higher scores indicate a higher level of adaptive functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in adaptive functioning. Composite V-scores have a mean (50th percentile) of 100 and a SD of 15.
Mean Change From Baseline in Test of Verbal Expression and Reasoning (TOVER) Total Score at Week 4 and 10-OC Baseline, Week 4 and Week 10 The TOVER is a participant-performance-based measure of expressive language function and verbal reasoning in response to questions about a series of stylized pictures showing identifiable scenarios. The 64-item test was specifically designed to assess language function in children and adults with down syndrome (DS) across a broad range of functional ability. The test used 23 multi-colored pictures to stimulate verbal responses to questions. The test was short (completed in 15 minutes) and fast-paced (2 to 4 questions per picture). Total score ranging from 0 to 64, was derived from 64 questions, where higher score indicates better functional ability.
Mean Change From Baseline in Test of Verbal Expression and Reasoning (TOVER) Total Score at Week 10-LOCF Baseline, Week 10 The TOVER is a participant-performance-based measure of expressive language function and verbal reasoning in response to questions about a series of stylized pictures showing identifiable scenarios. The 64-item test was specifically designed to assess language function in children and adults with DS across a broad range of functional ability. The test used 23 multi-colored pictures to stimulate verbal responses to questions. The test was short (completed in 15 minutes) and fast-paced (2 to 4 questions per picture). Total score ranging from 0 to 64, was derived from 64 questions, where higher score indicates better functional ability.
Trial Locations
- Locations (31)
Community Research Foundation
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Miami Children's Hospital, Brain Institute
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
UCSD Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Duke University Medical Center
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States
Road Runner Research
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
Alamo City Clinical Research, LLC
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
Clinical Study Centers, L.L.C.
🇺🇸Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Neufeld Medical Group, Inc.
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland
🇺🇸Oakland, California, United States
University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics
🇺🇸Orange, California, United States
Rocky Mountain Pediatrics
🇺🇸Lakewood, Colorado, United States
Neuropsychiatric Research Center of South West Florida
🇺🇸Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Miami Children's Hospital, Clinical Research Center
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Meridien Research
🇺🇸Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States
Lazlo J. Mate, MD
🇺🇸West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Child Neurology Associates, PC
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Saint Mayr's Health Care
🇺🇸Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Medical Genetics and Neuro Development Center
🇺🇸Zionsville, Indiana, United States
Hurley Medical Center
🇺🇸Flint, Michigan, United States
Regions Hospital
🇺🇸Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Midwest Children's Health Research Institute, LLC
🇺🇸Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Genetics and Genomic Medicine
🇺🇸Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
Metrohealth Medical Center, Division of Psychiatry
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Tulsa Clinical Research LLC
🇺🇸Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Down Syndrome Clinic of Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Valko and Associates
🇺🇸Toledo, Ohio, United States
Northwest Clinical Research Center
🇺🇸Bellevue, Washington, United States
Vanderbilt Children's Hospital
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Phoenix Children's Hospital
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Clinical Research Center of New Jersey
🇺🇸Voorhees, New Jersey, United States
Medical University of South Carolina, Division of Genetics and Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
🇺🇸Charleston, South Carolina, United States